Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V.H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V.
VS
Europcar Mobility GroupEuropcar Mobility Group
H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V.

H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V.

A.J. Ernststraat 595 E-1, Amsterdam, 1082 LD, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tojapan.nl
741/1000Moderate

H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. is the BeNeLux branch office of HIS Co., Ltd.. We offer services in the BeNeLux for both inbound and outbound passengers, which currently are mainly Japanese nationals. We like to offer our quality services to non-Japanese customers as well ...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Europcar Mobility Group

Europcar Mobility Group

13 ter Boulevard Berthier, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75017

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
714/1000Moderate

Europcar Mobility Group is a global mobility player, with 75 years of mobility services expertise and a leading position in Europe. “We help to change the way you move” is what we stand for and brings us together. More than ever, we're committed to delivering simple, s...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:10,562
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V.

H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Europcar Mobility Group

Europcar Mobility Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Europcar Mobility Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Europcar Mobility Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Europcar Mobility Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V.

H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
H.I1765771448
Europcar Mobility Group

Europcar Mobility Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EUR531040425

FAQ

Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. and Europcar Mobility Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. and Europcar Mobility Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. or Europcar Mobility Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. or Europcar Mobility Group ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. and Europcar Mobility Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between H.I.S. Travel Nederland B.V. and Europcar Mobility Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1