Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GustoMSCGustoMSC
VS
ENGIE Solutions FranceENGIE Solutions France
GustoMSC

GustoMSC

Karel Doormanweg 35, Schiedam, undefined, 3115 JD, NL

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nov.com/gustomsc
753/1000Fair

GustoMSC is part of NOV, a leading provider of technology and equipment to the global energy industry. We design and engineer advanced mobile offshore units and provide reliable offshore equipment. With our experience, scientific knowledge, and technical expertise, we a...

NAICS:541391
NAICS Definition:Professional Services
Employees:311
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ENGIE Solutions France

ENGIE Solutions France

1 Place Samuel de Champlain, Courbevoie, 92400, FR

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
777/1000Fair

ENGIE Solutions, l'allié de confiance des entreprises, des industries et des collectivités engagées dans la neutralité carbone. Grâce à la pluralité de nos compétences, de nos capacités et de nos champs d’intervention, nous sommes en mesure d’offrir des solutions glob...

NAICS:541391
NAICS Definition:Professional Services
Employees:12,334
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GustoMSC

GustoMSC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ENGIE Solutions France

ENGIE Solutions France

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Services for Renewable Energy Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GustoMSC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Services for Renewable Energy Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ENGIE Solutions France in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GustoMSC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GustoMSC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ENGIE Solutions France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ENGIE Solutions France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GustoMSC

GustoMSC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ENGIE Solutions France

ENGIE Solutions France

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GustoMSC company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GustoMSC company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GustoMSC company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GustoMSC company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GustoMSC company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GustoMSC company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GustoMSC company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GustoMSC company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GustoMSC company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GustoMSC company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GustoMSC company and ENGIE Solutions France company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GustoMSC and ENGIE Solutions France, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GustoMSC and ENGIE Solutions France, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GustoMSC or ENGIE Solutions France ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GustoMSC or ENGIE Solutions France ?
Between GustoMSC and ENGIE Solutions France, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GustoMSC and ENGIE Solutions France, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56355
SUMMARY

GNU Savannah Administration Savane through 3.17 uses untrusted data as part of authorization.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-56347
SUMMARY

AVideo TopMenu plugin through version 26.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in menu item rendering due to missing output encoding of icon classes, URLs, and text labels. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript through unescaped menu item fields that execute for all site visitors, potentially stealing session cookies or performing unauthorized actions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56346
SUMMARY

AVideo through version 25.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the decryptMessage.json.php endpoint that allows unauthenticated users to decrypt PGP messages. Remote attackers can submit private keys, ciphertext, and passphrases to perform server-side decryption without credentials, exposing key material to logs and enabling resource exhaustion attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56345
SUMMARY

AVideo through 29.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the Meet plugin's uploadRecordedVideo.json.php endpoint that derives the target users_id from the uploaded filename without verification. An attacker with knowledge of the Meet shared secret can craft a malicious file upload with a filename containing an arbitrary users_id to invoke passwordless User->login() and establish an authenticated session as any user including admin. Attackers can obtain the Meet shared secret through path-traversal vulnerabilities or timing attacks against checkToken.json.php, then POST a crafted file to uploadRecordedVideo.json.php with a filename like '1-anything.mp4' to hijack admin sessions and gain full account takeover.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-56342
SUMMARY

AVideo through version 27.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in plugin/Live/test.php that allows authenticated administrators to read arbitrary URLs via the statsURL parameter, which lacks isSSRFSafeURL() validation and accepts requests to private IP ranges and cloud metadata endpoints. Attackers can exploit this by crafting requests to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints like 169.254.169.254, and localhost to retrieve sensitive information including IAM credentials, internal service responses, and network configuration details.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3