Comparison Overview

Gulf Health Council

VS

Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health

Gulf Health Council

6375 Abdullah Alsahmi St, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 7431 Riyadh 11462, SA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

About us: The Gulf Health Council› Council for the Cooperation Council States is a regional technical specialized organization with its membership restricted only to the «Cooperation Council States. It enjoys the juridical identity and the administrative and financial independence. It works to realize the cooperation and integration in the health fields among the Cooperation Council States. The GHC entertains full capacities and reference required to carry out the objectives included in the statutes which shall not contradict with the statutes of the Cooperation Council. Vision The Gulf Health Council aims to be one of the leading GCC organizations in dissemination of preventive and curative health awareness across the region. Mission To unite the efforts of GCC Member States to achieve a unified Gulf health strategy to provide the highest levels of health for the citizens of Member States.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health

120 Washington Street, Salem, Massachusetts, 01970-6396, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health (MACGH) was founded to help individuals struggling with gambling. Today, we’ve grown into a private, non-profit public health agency offering a range of services for those impacted by gambling and gaming. Our work engages industry stakeholders, clinicians, policymakers, and community professionals from across the globe. And 40 years later, we still support individuals and their loved ones. Our commitment strives to balance public health priorities with a people-first model for gambling and gaming.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gulf-health-council.jpeg
Gulf Health Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-council-on-compulsive-gambling.jpeg
Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gulf Health Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gulf Health Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health in 2025.

Incident History — Gulf Health Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gulf Health Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gulf-health-council.jpeg
Gulf Health Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-council-on-compulsive-gambling.jpeg
Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Gulf Health Council company and Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gulf Health Council company.

In the current year, Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company and Gulf Health Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company nor Gulf Health Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company nor Gulf Health Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company nor Gulf Health Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gulf Health Council company nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gulf Health Council nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gulf Health Council company nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gulf Health Council company employs more people globally than Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither Gulf Health Council nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gulf Health Council nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gulf Health Council nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gulf Health Council nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gulf Health Council nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gulf Health Council nor Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.