Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Guildford County SchoolGuildford County School
VS
University of California, San FranciscoUniversity of California, San Francisco
Guildford County School

Guildford County School

Farnham Road, Guildford, Surrey, GB, GU2 4LU

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

Guildford County School is an outstanding Academy secondary school for students aged 11 to 18 in the heart of Guildford, Surrey, England. Founded in 1905, GCS is a specialist music college with an established reputation for academic excellence developed in a caring comm...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:172
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
University of California, San Francisco

University of California, San Francisco

530 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, California, US, 94122

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.ucsf.edu
688/1000Weak

UC San Francisco is driven by the idea that when the best research, the best education and the best patient care converge, great breakthroughs are achieved. We pursue this integrated excellence with singular focus, fueled by collaboration among our top-ranked profession...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:21,346
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Guildford County School

Guildford County School

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of California, San Francisco

University of California, San Francisco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guildford County School in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of California, San Francisco in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Guildford County School (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guildford County School cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of California, San Francisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of California, San Francisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Guildford County School

Guildford County School

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GUI212427123
University of California, San Francisco

University of California, San Francisco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UCS000122224

FAQ

Between Guildford County School company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Guildford County School company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Guildford County School company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Guildford County School company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Guildford County School company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Guildford County School company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Guildford County School company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Guildford County School company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Guildford County School company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Guildford County School company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Guildford County School company and University of California, San Francisco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Guildford County School and University of California, San Francisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Guildford County School and University of California, San Francisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Guildford County School or University of California, San Francisco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Guildford County School or University of California, San Francisco ?
Between Guildford County School and University of California, San Francisco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Guildford County School and University of California, San Francisco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9