Comparison Overview

Guggenheim New York

VS

Swiss Institute

Guggenheim New York

1071 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10128, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1937, the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation is dedicated to promoting the understanding and appreciation of art, architecture, and other manifestations of visual culture, primarily of the modern and contemporary periods. The Guggenheim realizes this mission through exceptional exhibitions, education programs, research initiatives, and publications. The Guggenheim strives to engage and educate an increasingly diverse international audience through its unique network of museums and partnerships. With nearly three million annual visitors worldwide, the Guggenheim and its network is one of the most visited cultural institutions in the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Swiss Institute

Last Update: 2026-01-23

Founded on May 7th, 1986, the Swiss Institute was officially registered with the State and City of New York as an independent, not-for-profit organization on September 12th, 1986. The Swiss Center Foundation provided important support helping the Swiss Institute to start its program. In 1990, though the Swiss Institute is not affiliated with the Swiss government, the Swiss government agreed to give the Institute an annual contribution, in addition to the amount already awarded by Pro Helvetia, the Art Council of Switzerland. Both contributions were and continue to be approved by a committee of experts. Between June 30, 1992 and June 30 1995, corporate contributions more than doubled. In 1994, the Institute moved to a large loft in SoHo, in the center of the New York art scene, where there is an interested art audience. The loft's raw space was constructed to museum-standard specifications by architects Pagamenta & Torriani. The Swiss Institute has grown from a showcase of Swiss art and artists for a mostly Swiss audience, into an innovative international venue for art that provides a significant forum for cultural dialogue between Switzerland, Europe, and the United States. This unique angle fosters the interaction between the Swiss and the many other communities and nationalities found in New York City. The result is a distinctive view of art and a way of thinking which asks audiences to break with traditional assumptions about art and national stereotypes.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guggenheim-museum.jpeg
Guggenheim New York
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swiss-institute-contemporary-art-ny.jpeg
Swiss Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Guggenheim New York
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swiss Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guggenheim New York in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiss Institute in 2026.

Incident History — Guggenheim New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guggenheim New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swiss Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiss Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guggenheim-museum.jpeg
Guggenheim New York
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swiss-institute-contemporary-art-ny.jpeg
Swiss Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Guggenheim New York company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Swiss Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Swiss Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Guggenheim New York company.

In the current year, Swiss Institute company and Guggenheim New York company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swiss Institute company nor Guggenheim New York company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Swiss Institute company nor Guggenheim New York company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Swiss Institute company nor Guggenheim New York company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Swiss Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Swiss Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Swiss Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Guggenheim New York company employs more people globally than Swiss Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Swiss Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Swiss Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Swiss Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Swiss Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Swiss Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Guggenheim New York nor Swiss Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H