Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Gü Desserts |  Certified B Corp™Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™
VS
Lee Kum KeeLee Kum Kee
Gü Desserts |  Certified B Corp™

Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™

Dunmow Road, Bishop's Stortford, GB, CM23 5PA

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gudesserts.com
757/1000Fair

Since 2003, we've been filling homes with indulgent treats, made up of layers of delicious textures and flavours. All served in your very own glass ramekin, making it perfectly portioned to take a short skip from fridge to sofa, ideal for a Friday night – or indeed, any...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:269
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lee Kum Kee

Lee Kum Kee

2-4 Dai Fat St, Tai Po Industrial Estate, Tai Po, Hong Kong, HK

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://corporate.lkk.com/en
770/1000Fair

Established in 1888, Lee Kum Kee is an international household name in authentic Asian sauces and condiments, as well as “a symbol of quality and trust”. As a globally renowned Chinese multinational corporation, Lee Kum Kee now offers over 200 types of sauce and condime...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:12,984
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gü Desserts |  Certified B Corp™

Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lee Kum Kee

Lee Kum Kee

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lee Kum Kee in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lee Kum Kee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lee Kum Kee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gü Desserts |  Certified B Corp™

Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lee Kum Kee

Lee Kum Kee

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ company and Lee Kum Kee company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ company and Lee Kum Kee company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ company and Lee Kum Kee company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ company and Lee Kum Kee company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ company and Lee Kum Kee company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ company and Lee Kum Kee company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ company and Lee Kum Kee company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ company and Lee Kum Kee company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ company and Lee Kum Kee company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ company and Lee Kum Kee company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ company and Lee Kum Kee company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ and Lee Kum Kee, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ and Lee Kum Kee, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ or Lee Kum Kee ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ or Lee Kum Kee ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ and Lee Kum Kee, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gü Desserts | Certified B Corp™ and Lee Kum Kee, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2