Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GuardarianGuardarian
VS
MassMutualMassMutual
Guardarian

Guardarian

Rotermann, Tallinn , EE

Last Update: 06/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://guardarian.com
730/1000Moderate

Guardarian is a licensed financial company in the field of providing virtual currency services (license nr. FVR000200 issued by the Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit). We help businesses with B2B exchanges & crypto payments solutions.

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
MassMutual

MassMutual

1295 State Street, Springfield, 01111, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.MassMutual.com
615/1000Poor

Living mutual has always been at the core of our human existence, and it's the principle that's guided us since our founding in 1851. It's not a concept we invented, but one we champion for the simple reason that people take it for granted today. While the world would ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:11,736
Subsidiaries:61
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Guardarian

Guardarian

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MassMutual

MassMutual

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Guardarian has 44.44% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MassMutual in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Guardarian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guardarian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MassMutual (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MassMutual cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Guardarian

Guardarian

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STRGUA1775478818
MassMutual

MassMutual

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS1026070925
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS654072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS701072625

FAQ

Between Guardarian company and MassMutual company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Guardarian company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Guardarian company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Guardarian company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Guardarian company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Guardarian company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Guardarian company and MassMutual company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Guardarian company and MassMutual company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Guardarian company and MassMutual company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Guardarian company and MassMutual company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Guardarian company and MassMutual company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Guardarian and MassMutual, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Guardarian and MassMutual, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Guardarian or MassMutual ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Guardarian or MassMutual ?
Between Guardarian and MassMutual, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Guardarian and MassMutual, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1