Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GTM BATIMENTGTM BATIMENT
VS
NCCNCC
GTM BATIMENT

GTM BATIMENT

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, FR

Last Update: 28/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gtm-batiment.fr/
758/1000Fair

A l’écoute de ses clients depuis 30 ans, GTM Bâtiment renouvelle sans cesse son savoir-faire. Notre entreprise se réinvente et continue ainsi à offrir des ouvrages de qualité grâce à des solutions innovantes et digitales. Les femmes et les hommes de GTM Bâtiment perpétu...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:1,072
Subsidiaries:123
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NCC

NCC

Herrjärva Torg 4, Stockholm, Solna, SE, 170 67

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ncc.com
759/1000Fair

NCC is one of the leading construction companies in the Nordics. Based on its expertise in managing complex construction processes, NCC contributes to a positive impact of construction for its customers and society. NCC is one of the largest players in the Nordic cons...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:12,952
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GTM BATIMENT

GTM BATIMENT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NCC

NCC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GTM BATIMENT in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NCC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GTM BATIMENT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GTM BATIMENT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NCC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NCC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GTM BATIMENT

GTM BATIMENT

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NCC

NCC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GTM BATIMENT company and NCC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GTM BATIMENT company and NCC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GTM BATIMENT company and NCC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GTM BATIMENT company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GTM BATIMENT company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GTM BATIMENT company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GTM BATIMENT company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GTM BATIMENT company and NCC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GTM BATIMENT company and NCC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GTM BATIMENT company and NCC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GTM BATIMENT company and NCC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GTM BATIMENT and NCC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GTM BATIMENT and NCC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GTM BATIMENT or NCC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GTM BATIMENT or NCC ?
Between GTM BATIMENT and NCC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GTM BATIMENT and NCC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9