Comparison Overview
GTM BATIMENT

GTM BATIMENT
undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, FR
Last Update: 28/02/2026
A l’écoute de ses clients depuis 30 ans, GTM Bâtiment renouvelle sans cesse son savoir-faire. Notre entreprise se réinvente et continue ainsi à offrir des ouvrages de qualité grâce à des solutions innovantes et digitales. Les femmes et les hommes de GTM Bâtiment perpétu...

Holcim
Grafenauweg 10, Zug, CH, 6300
Last Update: 19/07/2026
Holcim is the leading partner for sustainable construction with net sales of CHF 15.7 billion in 2025, creating value across the built environment from infrastructure and industry to buildings. We have more than 45 000 employees in 43 attractive markets – across Europ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

GTM BATIMENT







Holcim






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GTM BATIMENT in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Holcim in 2026.
Incident History - GTM BATIMENT (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GTM BATIMENT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Holcim (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Holcim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

GTM BATIMENT

Holcim
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.