Comparison Overview
Gtek Communications

Gtek Communications
4811 Wildcat Dr., Portland, TX, US, 78374
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Gtek is a leading wireless service provider utilizing the latest Wireless Technology to deliver advanced, high-speed Internet access to businesses and residential markets in the South Texas Area. Gtek delivers a reliable last mile solution. Unlike other Internet service...

Swiggy
Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Swiggy is India’s pioneering on-demand convenience platform, catering to millions of consumers each month. Founded in 2014, its mission is to elevate the quality of life for the urban consumer by offering unparalleled convenience. With an extensive footprint in food del...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Gtek Communications







Swiggy






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gtek Communications in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Swiggy in 2026.
Incident History - Gtek Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gtek Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Swiggy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Swiggy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Gtek Communications

Swiggy
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.