Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Gtd PerúGtd Perú
VS
SFRSFR
Gtd Perú

Gtd Perú

Av. La Encalada 1257, Santiago de Surco, Lima, Lima 33, PE

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gtdperu.com
755/1000Fair

Somos Gtd Perú, una empresa de la multinacional Gtd, que cuenta con más de 44 años de experiencia en el sector de telecomunicaciones y servicios TI, con operaciones en diferentes países cómo en Perú, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, México y España. Contamos con una oferta mu...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:258
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SFR

SFR

16, Rue du Général Alain de Boissieu, Paris, 75015, FR

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://recrutement.sfr.com/
694/1000Weak

SFR is the number one alternative telecoms operator in France. SFR is also an operator providing a comprehensive range of services meeting the expectations of private and business customers alike, offering them the best of the digital world. At year-end 2011, the total ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:11,376
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gtd Perú

Gtd Perú

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SFR

SFR

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gtd Perú in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

SFR has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Gtd Perú (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gtd Perú cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SFR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SFR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gtd Perú

Gtd Perú

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SFR

SFR

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ATOSFR1787560233

FAQ

Between Gtd Perú company and SFR company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gtd Perú company and SFR company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gtd Perú company and SFR company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gtd Perú company and SFR company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gtd Perú company and SFR company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gtd Perú company and SFR company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gtd Perú company and SFR company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gtd Perú company and SFR company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gtd Perú company and SFR company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gtd Perú company and SFR company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gtd Perú company and SFR company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gtd Perú and SFR, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gtd Perú and SFR, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gtd Perú or SFR ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gtd Perú or SFR ?
Between Gtd Perú and SFR, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gtd Perú and SFR, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8