Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GSMA M360 SeriesGSMA M360 Series
VS
TELUSTELUS
GSMA M360 Series

GSMA M360 Series

1 Angel Lane, London, England, EC4R 3AB, GB

Last Update: 13/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.m360series.com/
755/1000Fair

GSMA M360 Series presents a conference platform cultivating regional engagement through topics that are impacting the mobile industry on both a localised and global scale. Senior executives in mobile and adjacent industry verticals come to learn and discuss in detail th...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TELUS

TELUS

510 West Georgia St., Vancouver, British Columbia, CA, V6B 0M3

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.telus.com
421/1000Critical

At TELUS, our purpose-driven team works together every day to innovate and do good. From providing technology solutions that make our lives safer and easier, to supporting those who need it most, our inclusive, spirited and giving people are passionate about empowering ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:37,132
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GSMA M360 Series

GSMA M360 Series

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TELUS

TELUS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GSMA M360 Series in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

TELUS has 371.7% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - GSMA M360 Series (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GSMA M360 Series cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TELUS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TELUS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GSMA M360 Series

GSMA M360 Series

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TELUS

TELUS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FORCISTELLEXSALCHAIVACAROPESTR1782226177
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOBTEL1776782580
🔒 Incident : Breach
NO-SHOPRELOB1773534483

FAQ

Between GSMA M360 Series company and TELUS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and TELUS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and TELUS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and TELUS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and TELUS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and TELUS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and TELUS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and TELUS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and TELUS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and TELUS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and TELUS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GSMA M360 Series and TELUS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GSMA M360 Series and TELUS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GSMA M360 Series or TELUS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GSMA M360 Series or TELUS ?
Between GSMA M360 Series and TELUS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GSMA M360 Series and TELUS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA