Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GSMA M360 SeriesGSMA M360 Series
VS
Telecom EgyptTelecom Egypt
GSMA M360 Series

GSMA M360 Series

1 Angel Lane, London, England, EC4R 3AB, GB

Last Update: 13/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.m360series.com/
755/1000Fair

GSMA M360 Series presents a conference platform cultivating regional engagement through topics that are impacting the mobile industry on both a localised and global scale. Senior executives in mobile and adjacent industry verticals come to learn and discuss in detail th...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Telecom Egypt

Telecom Egypt

B7 Building, Smart Village, EG

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.te.eg
674/1000Weak

Since its establishment in 1854, Telecom Egypt has played a pivotal role in driving growth within the local ICT market capitalizing on its vast infrastructure, which is one of the largest in the region. Its vast domestic and international infrastructure has helped it se...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:18,312
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GSMA M360 Series

GSMA M360 Series

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Telecom Egypt

Telecom Egypt

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GSMA M360 Series in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telecom Egypt in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GSMA M360 Series (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GSMA M360 Series cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Telecom Egypt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telecom Egypt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GSMA M360 Series

GSMA M360 Series

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Telecom Egypt

Telecom Egypt

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TEL1769571408

FAQ

Between GSMA M360 Series company and Telecom Egypt company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and Telecom Egypt company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and Telecom Egypt company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and Telecom Egypt company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and Telecom Egypt company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and Telecom Egypt company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and Telecom Egypt company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and Telecom Egypt company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and Telecom Egypt company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and Telecom Egypt company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GSMA M360 Series company and Telecom Egypt company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GSMA M360 Series and Telecom Egypt, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GSMA M360 Series and Telecom Egypt, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GSMA M360 Series or Telecom Egypt ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GSMA M360 Series or Telecom Egypt ?
Between GSMA M360 Series and Telecom Egypt, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GSMA M360 Series and Telecom Egypt, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA