Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)
VS
Ulta BeautyUlta Beauty
(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

GS Tower 508, Nonhyeon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, KR, 06141

Last Update: 31/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.gsretail.com/
472/1000Critical

GS리테일은 최고의 제품과 진실된 서비스로 고객을 만족시키며 높은 수익을 창출하고, 지속적으로 성장하는 기업입니다. 유통업계의 Leading Company인 GS리테일은 편의점, 수퍼, 헬스&뷰티, 호텔 사업 등 다양한 사업을 기반으로 트렌드를 선도하고 있습니다. 탁월한 조직 역량과 경영을 바탕으로 GS리테일은 꾸준히 성장과 이익의 균형이 잡힌 성과를 내고 있습니다. 통합 쇼핑 플랫폼의 선두 주자인 GS홈쇼핑은 GS리테일의 가족이 되었습니다. GS홈쇼핑은 TV, 카탈로그, 인터...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:974
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Ulta Beauty

Ulta Beauty

1000 Remington Blvd, Bolingbrook, 60440, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.ulta.com/
813/1000Good

At Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ: ULTA), the possibilities are beautiful. Ulta Beauty is the largest U.S. beauty retailer and the premier beauty destination for cosmetics, fragrance, skin care products, hair care products and salon services. In 1990, the Company reinvented the be...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:38,390
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ulta Beauty

Ulta Beauty

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) has 44.13% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ulta Beauty in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ulta Beauty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ulta Beauty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GS-KORSUN1788150289
🔒 Incident : Breach
GS-1788144886
🔒 Incident : Breach
GS-1788150360
Ulta Beauty

Ulta Beauty

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Ulta Beauty company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Ulta Beauty company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Ulta Beauty company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) and Ulta Beauty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) and Ulta Beauty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) or Ulta Beauty ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) or Ulta Beauty ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) and Ulta Beauty, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) and Ulta Beauty, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-95828
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in Mstfakts College-Management-System. This affects the function session_start of the file Front-end/server.php of the component Authentication. Executing a manipulation can lead to session fixiation. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-22
UPDATED
Date2026-09-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-95820
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in anirbandutta9 College-Notes-Gallery up to 8c1cf3d98f30982d069c88ca172612c001eb39f6. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /dashboard/userprofile.php?section=admin1. Performing a manipulation of the argument image results in unrestricted upload. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-22
UPDATED
Date2026-09-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61685
SUMMARY

ReactPress is a publishing system for React developers. Prior to version 3.7.0, ReactPress API list endpoints build TypeORM `QueryBuilder` conditions using unsanitized HTTP query parameter names as SQL column identifiers (e.g. `` `article.${key}` ``). TypeORM parameterizes values but not column names, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject SQL through crafted query string keys. Version 3.7.0 contains a patch. As a workaround, allowlist allowed filter column names before interpolating into SQL.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-22
UPDATED
Date2026-09-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-57576
SUMMARY

plone.app.dexterity is a content-type system for the Plone content management system, and plone.app.contenttypes provides Plone’s Dexterity-based content types. Plone.app.dexterity versions through 3.2.2, 4.0.0 through 4.1.2, and 5.0.0, and plone.app.contenttypes versions through 3.0.11, 4.0.0 through 4.0.9, and 5.0.0 are vulnerable to denial of service because an authenticated user can create content with excessively long titles, descriptions, or uploaded-file names, causing Plone to become unresponsive and potentially making the resulting content difficult to edit or delete. The vulnerability is patched in plone.app.dexterity versions 3.2.3, 4.1.3, and 5.0.1, and in plone.app.contenttypes versions 3.0.12, 4.0.10, and 5.0.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-22
UPDATED
Date2026-09-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-18176
SUMMARY

IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-22
UPDATED
Date2026-09-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8