Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Gruppo ComifarGruppo Comifar
VS
Kuehne+NagelKuehne+Nagel
Gruppo Comifar

Gruppo Comifar

via F.lli di Dio, 2, Novate Milanese, IT, 20026

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.comifar.it/
755/1000Fair

Il leader italiano della distribuzione farmaceutica. Il Gruppo Comifar è il principale operatore della distribuzione farmaceutica italiana, con una quota di mercato di circa il 19%. Il Gruppo Comifar opera attraverso quattro società specializzate nella distribuzione f...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:853
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kuehne+Nagel

Kuehne+Nagel

Kuehne + Nagel, Schindellegi, 8834, CH

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.kuehne-nagel.com
801/1000Good

With more than 82,000 employees at almost 1,300 sites in close to 100 countries, the Kuehne+Nagel Group is one of the world's leading logistics providers. Headquartered in Switzerland, Kuehne+Nagel is listed in the Swiss blue-chip stock market index, the SMI. The Grou...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:50,462
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gruppo Comifar

Gruppo Comifar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kuehne+Nagel

Kuehne+Nagel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gruppo Comifar in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kuehne+Nagel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Gruppo Comifar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gruppo Comifar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kuehne+Nagel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kuehne+Nagel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gruppo Comifar

Gruppo Comifar

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kuehne+Nagel

Kuehne+Nagel

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Gruppo Comifar company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gruppo Comifar company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gruppo Comifar company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gruppo Comifar company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gruppo Comifar company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gruppo Comifar company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gruppo Comifar company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gruppo Comifar company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gruppo Comifar company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gruppo Comifar company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gruppo Comifar company and Kuehne+Nagel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gruppo Comifar and Kuehne+Nagel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gruppo Comifar and Kuehne+Nagel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gruppo Comifar or Kuehne+Nagel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gruppo Comifar or Kuehne+Nagel ?
Between Gruppo Comifar and Kuehne+Nagel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gruppo Comifar and Kuehne+Nagel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3