Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision ItalyOptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy
VS
WalmartWalmart
OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy

OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy

Via Ruggiero Settimo, 55, Palermo, Italia/Palermo, 90139, IT

Last Update: 28/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.optissimo.it
768/1000Fair

L’azienda, realtà leader nel settore dell’ottica, presente con oltre 190 punti vendita con le insegne Optissimo e Corner Optique all’interno della grande distribuzione, tutti gestiti direttamente, ha 135 anni di storia e fa parte dal 2014 del gruppo leader a livello mon...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:86
Subsidiaries:71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Walmart

Walmart

702 SW 8th St, Bentonville, Arkansas, US, 72712

Last Update: 13/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://bit.ly/3IBowlZ
793/1000Fair

More than 60 years ago, Sam Walton opened the first Walmart in Rogers, Arkansas. Today, we’re a people-led, tech-powered omnichannel retailer dedicated to helping people save money and live better all around the world. Our 2.1 million associates are the engine behind w...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:479,584
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy

OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Walmart

Walmart

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Walmart has 96.08% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Walmart (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walmart cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy

OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Walmart

Walmart

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VIBATTAMAPAYFBIINTWALCAS1791910145
🔒 Incident : Breach
WOFAUBWALDOO1772749980
🔒 Incident : Breach
WAL351072925

FAQ

Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy company and Walmart company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy company and Walmart company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy company and Walmart company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy company and Walmart company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy company and Walmart company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy company and Walmart company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy company and Walmart company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy company and Walmart company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy company and Walmart company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy company and Walmart company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy company and Walmart company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy and Walmart, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy and Walmart, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy or Walmart ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy or Walmart ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy and Walmart, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OptissimO & Corner Optique - GrandVision Italy and Walmart, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-110873
SUMMARY

Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110872
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-110871
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110870
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-110869
SUMMARY

Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9