Comparison Overview

Grupo Bimbo

VS

Coca-Cola HBC

Grupo Bimbo

MX
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://grupobimbo.com

Grupo Bimbo es la empresa líder en panificación y un jugador relevante en snacks. Hornea +9,000 productos, distribuyéndolos a través de +3.5 millones de puntos de venta con +58,000 rutas. Grupo Bimbo tiene +149,000 colaboradores, +1,500 centros de ventas estratégicamente localizados en 35 países de América, Europa, Asia y África. 223 panaderías y plantas, distribuye, comercializa y elabora una variedad de productos, entre los que destacan el pan de caja, bollería, pan dulce, pastelitos, galletas, pan tostado, English muffins, bagels, tortillas y flatbread y botanas saladas, entre otros. Grupo Bimbo tiene +100 marcas, algunas de ellas son Bimbo, Marinela, Barcel, Milpa Real, Tía Rosa, Thomas, Takis, Sara Lee, Little Bites, Artesano, Saníssimo, Pullman, Ideal, Harvest Gold, The Rustik Bakery, Dempsters, POM, Supán, entre otros. Sus acciones cotizan en la Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (BMV) bajo la clave de pizarra BIMBO y en el mercado extrabursátil de Estados Unidos a través de un programa de ADR Nivel 1, bajo la clave de pizarra BMBOY.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 44,957
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Coca-Cola HBC

Turmstrasse 30, Zug, 6300, CH
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 800 and 849
http://www.coca-colahellenic.com

We bottle and sell the beverages of The Coca-Cola Company exclusively in our 29 markets and partner with other beverage businesses to also sell their brands. With over 100 brands covering eight categories – sparkling, water, juices, ready-to-drink tea, energy, plant-based, premium spirits and coffee, we help our customers delight consumers with the drink they want, when and where they want it, around the clock. These brands cater to a growing range of tastes with a wider choice of healthier options, premium products and increasingly sustainable packaging. Sustainability is integrated within every aspect of our business. It is fundamental to our business strategy, which aims to create and share value with all of our stakeholders. This defines how we run our business, carry out our activities and develop our relationships. In doing so, we foster an open and inclusive work environment with our 33,000+ employees who share a passion for serving our customers and communities and building a more positive environmental impact.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 21,897
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupobimbo.jpeg
Grupo Bimbo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coca-cola-hbc.jpeg
Coca-Cola HBC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grupo Bimbo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coca-Cola HBC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Bimbo in 2026.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coca-Cola HBC in 2026.

Incident History — Grupo Bimbo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Bimbo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coca-Cola HBC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coca-Cola HBC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupobimbo.jpeg
Grupo Bimbo
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coca-cola-hbc.jpeg
Coca-Cola HBC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Coca-Cola HBC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grupo Bimbo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Grupo Bimbo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Coca-Cola HBC company has not reported any.

In the current year, Coca-Cola HBC company and Grupo Bimbo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coca-Cola HBC company nor Grupo Bimbo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Grupo Bimbo company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Coca-Cola HBC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Coca-Cola HBC company nor Grupo Bimbo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Grupo Bimbo company nor Coca-Cola HBC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grupo Bimbo nor Coca-Cola HBC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Grupo Bimbo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Coca-Cola HBC company.

Grupo Bimbo company employs more people globally than Coca-Cola HBC company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Grupo Bimbo nor Coca-Cola HBC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grupo Bimbo nor Coca-Cola HBC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grupo Bimbo nor Coca-Cola HBC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grupo Bimbo nor Coca-Cola HBC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grupo Bimbo nor Coca-Cola HBC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grupo Bimbo nor Coca-Cola HBC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References