Comparison Overview
Grupo GPS

Grupo GPS
Avenida Miguel Frias e Vasconcelos, 1205 - Jaguaré, São Paulo, 05345000, BR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Fundado em 1962, em Salvador, o Grupo GPS é um grupo empresarial composto por empresas atuantes no mercado brasileiro de serviços indoor: GPS – Gerenciamento de segurança patrimonial Predial – Soluções em infra serviços In-Haus – Logística flexível traduzida em resulta...

Mitie
The Shard, Level 12, 32 London Bridge Street, London, SE1 9SG, GB
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Founded in 1987, Mitie is the UK’s leading facilities management and professional services company. We offer a range of specialist services including Security, Engineering Services, Cleaning, Landscaping, Energy and Property Consultancy, Property Maintenance, and Custod...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Grupo GPS







Mitie






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Grupo GPS in 2026.
Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mitie in 2026.
Incident History - Grupo GPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Grupo GPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mitie (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mitie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Grupo GPS

Mitie
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.