Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GRSA|EducaçãoGRSA|Educação
VS
Jack in the BoxJack in the Box
GRSA|Educação

GRSA|Educação

São Paulo, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
782/1000Fair

Alimentação Saudável para nutrir a aprendizagem. Nutrir o futuro é o nosso maior objetivo, e isso acontece literalmente quando trabalhamos com escolas e universidades. Somos referência em alimentação escolar, de educação infantil a universidades e MBAs, porque entregam...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Jack in the Box

Jack in the Box

9357 Spectrum Center Blvd, San Diego, California, US, 92123

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jackinthebox.com
760/1000Fair

Jack in the Box has always been the place for those who live outside the box. Where you can try new things and order what you want when you want it. Now, let’s get to the facts! Did you know Jack in the Box was founded on February 21, 1951, by a businessman named Robert...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:20,918
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GRSA|Educação

GRSA|Educação

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Jack in the Box

Jack in the Box

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GRSA|Educação in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jack in the Box in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GRSA|Educação (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GRSA|Educação cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Jack in the Box (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jack in the Box cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GRSA|Educação

GRSA|Educação

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Jack in the Box

Jack in the Box

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GRSA|Educação company and Jack in the Box company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GRSA|Educação company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GRSA|Educação company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GRSA|Educação company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GRSA|Educação company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GRSA|Educação company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GRSA|Educação company and Jack in the Box company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GRSA|Educação company and Jack in the Box company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GRSA|Educação company and Jack in the Box company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GRSA|Educação company and Jack in the Box company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GRSA|Educação company and Jack in the Box company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GRSA|Educação and Jack in the Box, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GRSA|Educação and Jack in the Box, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GRSA|Educação or Jack in the Box ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GRSA|Educação or Jack in the Box ?
Between GRSA|Educação and Jack in the Box, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GRSA|Educação and Jack in the Box, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2