Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Growgreen LimitedGrowgreen Limited
VS
HARMAN InternationalHARMAN International
Growgreen Limited

Growgreen Limited

No 1 Science Park West Avenue, , Hong Kong Science Park, Shatin, 852, HK

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.grow-green.com
752/1000Fair

Growgreen combines the new generation’s planting ideas with advanced technology to bring green tech to homes for green living. Proudly presented by Growgreen, aspara is a Smart Grower for home. Thanks to its patent pending LED grow light design, smart sensors and fully...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:74
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

400 Atlantic St, Stamford, Connecticut, US, 06901

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.harman.com
786/1000Fair

Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, HARMAN (harman.com) designs and engineers connected products and solutions for automakers, consumers, and enterprises worldwide, including connected car systems, audio and visual products, enterprise automation solutions; and serv...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:27,680
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Growgreen Limited

Growgreen Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Growgreen Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HARMAN International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Growgreen Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Growgreen Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HARMAN International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HARMAN International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Growgreen Limited

Growgreen Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HARPANMINLOR1790181038

FAQ

Between Growgreen Limited company and HARMAN International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Growgreen Limited company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Growgreen Limited company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Growgreen Limited company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Growgreen Limited company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Growgreen Limited company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Growgreen Limited company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Growgreen Limited company and HARMAN International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Growgreen Limited company and HARMAN International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Growgreen Limited company and HARMAN International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Growgreen Limited company and HARMAN International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Growgreen Limited and HARMAN International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Growgreen Limited and HARMAN International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Growgreen Limited or HARMAN International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Growgreen Limited or HARMAN International ?
Between Growgreen Limited and HARMAN International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Growgreen Limited and HARMAN International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3