Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GroupM IndonesiaGroupM Indonesia
VS
TBWA\WorldwideTBWA\Worldwide
GroupM Indonesia

GroupM Indonesia

Jl. Prof. DR. Satrio No.17, RT.17/RW.4, Kuningan, Karet Kuningan, Setiabudi, South Jakarta, Jakarta, 12930, ID

Last Update: 24/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.groupm.com/
752/1000Fair

GroupM is the world’s leading media investment company responsible for more than $50B in annual media investment through agencies Mindshare, MediaCom, Wavemaker, Essence and m/SIX, as well as the outcomes-driven programmatic audience company, Xaxis. GroupM’s portfolio i...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:196
Subsidiaries:170
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TBWA\Worldwide

TBWA\Worldwide

220 E 42nd St, New York, 10017, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tbwa.com
777/1000Fair

TBWA is The Disruption Company®. We are a Collective of creative minds with an unlimited creative canvas. We create brand platforms that defy convention and compete with culture. Thanks to our trademarked Disruption® methodology, we build the world’s strongest brands. B...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:11,394
Subsidiaries:72
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GroupM Indonesia

GroupM Indonesia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TBWA\Worldwide

TBWA\Worldwide

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GroupM Indonesia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TBWA\Worldwide in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GroupM Indonesia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GroupM Indonesia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TBWA\Worldwide (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TBWA\Worldwide cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GroupM Indonesia

GroupM Indonesia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TBWA\Worldwide

TBWA\Worldwide

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GroupM Indonesia company and TBWA\Worldwide company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GroupM Indonesia company and TBWA\Worldwide company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GroupM Indonesia company and TBWA\Worldwide company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GroupM Indonesia company and TBWA\Worldwide company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GroupM Indonesia company and TBWA\Worldwide company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GroupM Indonesia company and TBWA\Worldwide company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GroupM Indonesia company and TBWA\Worldwide company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GroupM Indonesia company and TBWA\Worldwide company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GroupM Indonesia company and TBWA\Worldwide company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GroupM Indonesia company and TBWA\Worldwide company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GroupM Indonesia company and TBWA\Worldwide company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GroupM Indonesia and TBWA\Worldwide, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GroupM Indonesia and TBWA\Worldwide, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GroupM Indonesia or TBWA\Worldwide ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GroupM Indonesia or TBWA\Worldwide ?
Between GroupM Indonesia and TBWA\Worldwide, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GroupM Indonesia and TBWA\Worldwide, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9