Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SMABTPSMABTP
VS
ICICI LombardICICI Lombard
SMABTP

SMABTP

8, Rue Louis Armand, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75015

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.smabtp.fr
674/1000Weak

With 4,400 employees, SMABTP provides insurance coverage for over 200,000 clients and members, meeting all their insurance needs — from businesses, professionals, artisans, and executives to individual customers. For over 165 years, SMABTP has specialized in professiona...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:2,909
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
ICICI Lombard

ICICI Lombard

ICICI Lombard House 414, P Balu Marg Near Siddhi Vinayak Temple, Prabhadevi , Mumbai , 400025, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.icicilombard.com/
778/1000Fair

ICICI Lombard is one of the leading private general insurance company in the country. The Company offers a well-diversified range of products through multiple distribution channels, including motor, health, crop, fire, personal accident, marine, engineering, and liabi...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:14,548
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SMABTP

SMABTP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ICICI Lombard

ICICI Lombard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SMABTP in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICICI Lombard in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SMABTP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SMABTP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ICICI Lombard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICICI Lombard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SMABTP

SMABTP

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ASEGRO1769571259
ICICI Lombard

ICICI Lombard

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SMABTP company and ICICI Lombard company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SMABTP company and ICICI Lombard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SMABTP company and ICICI Lombard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SMABTP company and ICICI Lombard company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SMABTP company and ICICI Lombard company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SMABTP company and ICICI Lombard company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SMABTP company and ICICI Lombard company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SMABTP company and ICICI Lombard company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SMABTP company and ICICI Lombard company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SMABTP company and ICICI Lombard company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SMABTP company and ICICI Lombard company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SMABTP and ICICI Lombard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SMABTP and ICICI Lombard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SMABTP or ICICI Lombard ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SMABTP or ICICI Lombard ?
Between SMABTP and ICICI Lombard, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SMABTP and ICICI Lombard, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA