Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Groupe LSDHGroupe LSDH
VS
CargillCargill
Groupe LSDH

Groupe LSDH

10, Route de l'aérodrome, Saint-Denis-de-l'Hôtel, Centre-Val de Loire, FR, 45550

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lsdh.fr
750/1000Fair

D’origine laitière, le groupe LSDH (Laiterie de Saint-Denis de l’Hotel) élabore aujourd’hui tout type de liquide alimentaire conditionné en emballage brique (carton) ou bouteille (plastique et verre), pour les rayons ambiant et réfrigéré. Depuis 2013, LSDH conditionne é...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:606
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cargill

Cargill

15407 McGinty Rd W, Wayzata, 55391, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.cargill.com
817/1000Good

Cargill is a family company committed to nourishing the world in a safe, responsible and sustainable way. With over 158 years of experience, we sit at the heart of the supply chain, partnering with producers and customers to source, make and deliver products that are vi...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:69,142
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Groupe LSDH

Groupe LSDH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cargill

Cargill

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Groupe LSDH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cargill in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Groupe LSDH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Groupe LSDH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cargill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cargill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Groupe LSDH

Groupe LSDH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cargill

Cargill

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Groupe LSDH company and Cargill company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Groupe LSDH company and Cargill company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Groupe LSDH company and Cargill company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Groupe LSDH company and Cargill company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Groupe LSDH company and Cargill company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Groupe LSDH company and Cargill company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Groupe LSDH company and Cargill company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Groupe LSDH company and Cargill company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Groupe LSDH company and Cargill company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Groupe LSDH company and Cargill company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Groupe LSDH company and Cargill company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Groupe LSDH and Cargill, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Groupe LSDH and Cargill, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Groupe LSDH or Cargill ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Groupe LSDH or Cargill ?
Between Groupe LSDH and Cargill, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Groupe LSDH and Cargill, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9