Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Groupe Le DuffGroupe Le Duff
VS
Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading LimitedLee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited
Groupe Le Duff

Groupe Le Duff

52 avenue du canada, Rennes, undefined, 35200, FR

Last Update: 21/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.groupeleduff.com
760/1000Fair

The world leader in bakery, pastry and catering, LE DUFF Group is present in more than 100 countries and on 5 continents. Since it was established in 1976, Le Duff Group has achieved its success through its restaurant chains (Brioche Dorée, Del Arte, Fournil de Pierre, ...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:6,196
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited

Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited

徐汇区南宁路970号李锦记大厦22F、23F、25F, 上海市, CN

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://china.lkk.com
761/1000Fair

Established in 1888 , Lee Kum Kee is an international household name in authentic Asian sauces and condiments , as well as "a symbol of quality and trust". As a globally renowned Chinese multinational corporation , Lee Kum Kee now offers over 200 types of sauce and cond...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:10,562
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Groupe Le Duff

Groupe Le Duff

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited

Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Groupe Le Duff in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Groupe Le Duff (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Groupe Le Duff cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Groupe Le Duff

Groupe Le Duff

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited

Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Groupe Le Duff company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Groupe Le Duff company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Groupe Le Duff company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Groupe Le Duff company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Groupe Le Duff company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Groupe Le Duff company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Groupe Le Duff company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Groupe Le Duff company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Groupe Le Duff company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Groupe Le Duff company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Groupe Le Duff company and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Groupe Le Duff and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Groupe Le Duff and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Groupe Le Duff or Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Groupe Le Duff or Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited ?
Between Groupe Le Duff and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Groupe Le Duff and Lee Kum Kee (China) Trading Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1