Comparison Overview

Groupama

VS

Marsh McLennan Agency

Groupama

8-10 rue d'astorg, Paris, FR, 75008
Last Update: 2025-12-09

« Etre là pour les autres, j'ai décidé d'en faire mon métier. » Portée par nos 32 000 collaborateurs, notre campagne de communication employeur souligne ce qui nous rassemble et nous rend fiers au quotidien : notre métier, le point de départ de belles histoires, humaines avant tout. Cette campagne met l’accent sur ce qui nous différencie de nos concurrents : notre ADN mutualiste. Au sein du Groupe Groupama, l’humain et le sens sont privilégiés. Nous recrutons des personnes et pas des diplômes, de belles personnalités qui seront demain au service de nos sociétaires et clients. ​ ​ La signature de cette campagne « Etre là pour les autres, j’ai décidé d’en faire mon métier » résonne avec notre raison d’être ​« Nous sommes là pour permettre au plus grand nombre de construire leur vie en confiance. » et notre positionnement de marque.​ Etre là pour les autres, c'est le point de départ de notre métier. Et c'est aussi le point de départ de belles histoires qui font notre Groupe et notre identité en tant qu'employeur. Des histoires vraies pleines d'humanité. Nos collaborateurs en ont plein à raconter ! Découvrez leurs belles histoires sur www.groupama-gan-recrute.com ! Vous aussi, vous voulez donner du sens à vos compétences ? Rejoignez nous ! Et sinon, le Groupe Groupama c'est plus de 50 entreprises dans 10 pays. Vous nous connaissez au travers de nos 2 marques commerciales Groupama et Gan. Nous accompagnons nos 12 millions de sociétaires et clients à chaque moment de leur vie grâce à nos experts et à notre savoir-faire.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 22,666
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Marsh McLennan Agency

360 Hamilton Ave, White Plains, New York, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA) provides business insurance, employee health & benefits, retirement & wealth, and private client insurance solutions to organizations and individuals seeking limitless possibilities. With over 15,000+ colleagues and 300+ offices across the United States and Canada, MMA combines the personalized service model of a local consultant with the global resources and expertise of the world’s leading professional services firm, Marsh McLennan (NYSE: MMC). MMA generates more than $5 billion in annualized revenue, making it one of the largest brokerage operations in North America.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 14,428
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/groupama.jpeg
Groupama
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marsh-mclennan-agency.jpeg
Marsh McLennan Agency
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Groupama
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marsh McLennan Agency
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Groupama in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh McLennan Agency in 2025.

Incident History — Groupama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Groupama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marsh McLennan Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh McLennan Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/groupama.jpeg
Groupama
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marsh-mclennan-agency.jpeg
Marsh McLennan Agency
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Groupama company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marsh McLennan Agency company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Marsh McLennan Agency company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Groupama company has not reported any.

In the current year, Marsh McLennan Agency company and Groupama company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency company nor Groupama company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Marsh McLennan Agency company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Groupama company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency company nor Groupama company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Groupama company nor Marsh McLennan Agency company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Groupama nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Groupama company nor Marsh McLennan Agency company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Groupama company employs more people globally than Marsh McLennan Agency company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Groupama nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Groupama nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Groupama nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Groupama nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Groupama nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Groupama nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N