Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Group Thermote & VanhalstGroup Thermote & Vanhalst
VS
John DeereJohn Deere
Group Thermote & Vanhalst

Group Thermote & Vanhalst

Waregem, BE

Last Update: 28/01/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tvh.com
813/1000Good

If you consider following us, please do so at our official LinkedIn page: linkedin.com/company/tvh Since 1969 TVH is worldwide leader in spare parts for forklifts, aerial work platforms and other industrial in plant vehicles. With a known database op 16 million ref...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:111
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
John Deere

John Deere

Moline, 61265, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.deere.com/AboutUs
821/1000Good

It doesn’t matter if you’ve never driven a tractor, mowed a lawn, or operated a dozer. With John Deere’s role in helping produce food, fiber, fuel, and infrastructure, we work for every single person on the planet. It all started nearly 200 years ago with a steel plow...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:53,435
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Group Thermote & Vanhalst

Group Thermote & Vanhalst

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
John Deere

John Deere

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Group Thermote & Vanhalst in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John Deere in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Group Thermote & Vanhalst (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Group Thermote & Vanhalst cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - John Deere (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John Deere cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Group Thermote & Vanhalst

Group Thermote & Vanhalst

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
John Deere

John Deere

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst company and John Deere company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst company and John Deere company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst company and John Deere company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst company and John Deere company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst company and John Deere company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst company and John Deere company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst company and John Deere company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst and John Deere, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst and John Deere, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Group Thermote & Vanhalst or John Deere ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Group Thermote & Vanhalst or John Deere ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst and John Deere, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Group Thermote & Vanhalst and John Deere, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8