Comparison Overview
GreenYellow

GreenYellow
1, Terrasse Bellini, Tour Initiale, PUTEAUX, 92800, FR
Last Update: 07/03/2026
In 17 years, GreenYellow has become a major player in the energy transition in France and abroad and a true partner of companies and communities. As an expert in decentralized PV production, energy efficiency projects and energy and electric mobility services, GreenYel...

ENGIE
1 place Samuel de Champlain, Paris, La défense, 92930, FR
Last Update: 05/09/2026
What if your next career adventure started with ENGIE? Joining ENGIE means being part of a company at the forefront of the energy transition, committed to accelerating the shift to a carbon-neutral economy. With 98,000 employees across 30 countries, ENGIE's operatio...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

GreenYellow







ENGIE






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Renewable Energy Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GreenYellow in 2026.
Incidents vs Renewable Energy Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ENGIE in 2026.
Incident History - GreenYellow (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GreenYellow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ENGIE (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ENGIE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

GreenYellow

ENGIE
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.