Comparison Overview

Greenvelope.com

VS

SONDA

Greenvelope.com

1620 4th Ave, Suite #200, Seattle, 98101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Greenvelope strives to deliver the most elegant electronic invitation service by emulating the experience of opening a "traditional" printed invitation. By creating a positive online experience, Greenvelope hopes more hosts will consider sending invitations electronically for formal events – to help save trees, and additionally save time and money. To express Greenvelope's commitment towards this goal, they donate a significant percentage of every sale to Mountains to Sounds, a non-profit organization that maintains forests. Together we can invite​ a greener future.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

SONDA

Teatinos 500, Santiago, CL
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

We are at the forefront of digital transformation in the Americas, positively impacting the lives of over 500 million people. As a key player in emerging industries, we drive innovation and change through ambitious modernization projects and cutting-edge solutions. By understanding the region's challenges and demands, we provide a comprehensive portfolio of business solutions tailored to the primary industries, driving innovation and success in the market. We operate in 13 countries with a dedicated team of over 15,000 regional employees, earning the trust of more than 5,000 corporate clients to lead their digital transformation journeys. Our extensive presence spans Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Ecuador, the United States, Canada, Mexico, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14,805
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenvelope-llc.jpeg
Greenvelope.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonda.jpeg
SONDA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Greenvelope.com
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SONDA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

Greenvelope.com has 71.43% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SONDA in 2026.

Incident History — Greenvelope.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greenvelope.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SONDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SONDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenvelope-llc.jpeg
Greenvelope.com
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing emails, Malicious links, Stolen credentials
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonda.jpeg
SONDA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SONDA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Greenvelope.com company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Greenvelope.com company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SONDA company has not reported any.

In the current year, Greenvelope.com company has reported more cyber incidents than SONDA company.

Neither SONDA company nor Greenvelope.com company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SONDA company nor Greenvelope.com company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Greenvelope.com company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while SONDA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Greenvelope.com company nor SONDA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor SONDA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SONDA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Greenvelope.com company.

SONDA company employs more people globally than Greenvelope.com company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor SONDA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor SONDA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor SONDA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor SONDA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor SONDA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Greenvelope.com nor SONDA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.