Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Greene King BreweryGreene King Brewery
VS
Perfetti Van MellePerfetti Van Melle
Greene King Brewery

Greene King Brewery

Westgate Brewery, Bury St Edmunds, IP33 1QT, GB

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

We’ve been brewing award-winning beer from our base in Bury St. Edmunds ever since the company was founded in 1799 by 19 year-old Benjamin Greene.

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:141
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Perfetti Van Melle

Perfetti Van Melle

Stationsplein ZW 997, SCHIPHOL OOST, 1117 CE, NL

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

Perfetti Van Melle is a privately owned company, producing and distributing candies and chewing gums in more than 150 countries worldwide. Employing over 17.000 people and operating 37 companies throughout the world, Perfetti Van Melle has a true global reach: it is p...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:11,469
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Greene King Brewery

Greene King Brewery

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Perfetti Van Melle

Perfetti Van Melle

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greene King Brewery in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Perfetti Van Melle in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Greene King Brewery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greene King Brewery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Perfetti Van Melle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Perfetti Van Melle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Greene King Brewery

Greene King Brewery

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Perfetti Van Melle

Perfetti Van Melle

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Greene King Brewery company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Greene King Brewery company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Greene King Brewery company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Greene King Brewery company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Greene King Brewery company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Greene King Brewery company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Greene King Brewery company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Greene King Brewery company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Greene King Brewery company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Greene King Brewery company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Greene King Brewery company and Perfetti Van Melle company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Greene King Brewery and Perfetti Van Melle, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Greene King Brewery and Perfetti Van Melle, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Greene King Brewery or Perfetti Van Melle ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Greene King Brewery or Perfetti Van Melle ?
Between Greene King Brewery and Perfetti Van Melle, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Greene King Brewery and Perfetti Van Melle, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA