Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Greenbrier Government Solutions

Greenbrier Government Solutions Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

ggswv.com

Greenbrier Government Solutions is a solutions provider and systems integrator with a team of experienced professionals who are passionate about technology and dedicated to providing the latest solutions to our federal government customers. As an SBA HUBZone, VetCert certified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), we understand the unique challenges faced by our customers and are committed to delivering high-quality, personalized service to meet their needs. We constantly strive to be a company that delivers an outstanding work product without requiring a lot of maintenance from our government clients. Our goal is to surpass your expectations and make your job easier, not more difficult. Our customer’s success is our


GGS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

GGS
Company Information
Website:http://www.ggswv.com
Employees number:31
Number of followers:678
NAICS:5415
Industry Type:IT Services and IT Consulting
Homepage:ggswv.com
GGS Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
GGSIT Services and IT Consulting
Updated:
18/03/2026
726/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
GGS Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
GGSIT Services and IT Consulting
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

GGS
GGSModerate
Current Score
726Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
-24 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
729Before Incident
JUNE 2026
728Before Incident
MAY 2026
727Before Incident
APRIL 2026
727Before Incident
MARCH 2026
750Before Incident
Cyber Attack
18 Mar 2026GGS
Greece’s National Defence General Staff, Romanian Air Force and Government of Serbia: FancyBear Server Leak Exposes Stolen Credentials, 2FA Secrets, NATO Targets

FancyBear’s OPSEC Blunder Exposes Russian Espionage Operations Targeting NATO-Aligned Governments

726After Incident
CRITICAL-24
MINHELGRE1773843944
FancyBear’s OPSEC Blunder Exposes Russian Espionage Operations Targeting NATO-Aligned Governments A critical operational security (OPSEC) failure by the Russian state-backed threat group APT28 (FancyBear) has exposed a live command-and-control (C2) server containing stolen credentials, two-factor authentication (2FA) secrets, and detailed logs of ongoing cyberespionage campaigns. The breach, analyzed by researchers from Ctrl-Alt-Intel and Hunt.io, provides unprecedented visibility into the group’s tactics, infrastructure, and high-value targets across Europe. ### The Exposure: A Goldmine of Stolen Data The compromised server, hosted on Namecheap infrastructure at 203.161.50[.]145, contained an open directory with: - 2,800+ exfiltrated emails - 240+ credential sets, including TOTP 2FA secrets - 140+ persistent email forwarding rules - 11,500+ harvested contact addresses - C2 source code, payloads, and operator logs Victims included government and military entities in Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia, and North Macedonia many of which are NATO members or closely aligned with the alliance. Targets ranged from regional Ukrainian prosecutors to the Romanian Air Force and Greece’s National Defence General Staff, aligning with Russia’s strategic focus on Ukraine-related military logistics and support. ### How the Attack Unfolded FancyBear’s campaign leveraged Roundcube and SquirrelMail webmail vulnerabilities, exploiting cross-site scripting (XSS) flaws to deploy malicious JavaScript payloads. Key components included: - "worker.js" family payloads: Silently stole credentials, exfiltrated entire inboxes, and harvested address books. - keyTwoAuth.js: Targeted the twofactor_gauthenticator plugin, extracting TOTP seeds and recovery codes in base64, enabling long-term 2FA bypass. - addRedirectMailBox.js: Abused Roundcube’s ManageSieve to create persistent email forwarding rules, ensuring continued access even if the initial XSS vector was closed. Phishing emails directed victims to a fake Google Docs domain (docs.google.com.spreadsheets.d.1ip6eeakdebmwteh36vana4hu-glaeksstsht-boujdk.zhblz[.]com), which used a fake reCAPTCHA (ClickFix) to deliver Metasploit payloads tied to the same C2 server. ### A Rare Glimpse into APT28’s Operations Despite prior exposure by CERT-UA in late 2024 linking the same IP to Roundcube exploitation and ClickFix phishing FancyBear continued operating from the server for nearly 500 days, into early 2026. The root cause was a basic but critical OPSEC mistake: leaving HTTP open directories exposed while staging payloads and exfiltrated data. Telemetry from Censys and Hunt.io revealed multiple open directories on port 8889 between January and March 2026, allowing defenders to download the full toolkit, observe campaign evolution, and track operator behavior in near real time. ### Geopolitical and Defensive Implications The victim profile reinforces APT28’s strategic targeting, focusing on nations providing military aid, training, or logistical support to Ukraine. The campaign overlaps with ESET’s "Operation RoundPress" and CERT-UA’s ClickFix advisories, further solidifying attribution to GRU-linked FancyBear. For defenders, the incident highlights vulnerabilities in webmail platforms (Roundcube, SquirrelMail), the risks of unhardened ManageSieve integrations, and the need to monitor for indicators like 203.161.50[.]145 and zhblz[.]com. Most critically, it demonstrates that even highly resourced state actors can make simple OPSEC errors, creating rare opportunities for disruption.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber Espionage
MOTIVATION
State-sponsored espionage, military intelligence gathering
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 2,800+ exfiltrated emails, 240+ credential sets (including TOTP 2FA secrets), 140+ persistent email forwarding rules, 11,500+ harvested contact addressesRoundcube webmailSquirrelMail webmailEmail serversOperational Impact: Persistent access to sensitive government and military communications, long-term espionage capabilitiesIdentity Theft Risk: High (TOTP seeds and recovery codes exposed)
DATA BREACH
EmailsCredentialsTwo-Factor Authentication (2FA) secretsContact addressesNumber Of Records Exposed: 2,800+ emails, 240+ credential sets, 11,500+ contact addressesSensitivity Of Data: High (military and government communications, TOTP seeds, recovery codes)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (emails, contact details, credentials)
FEBRUARY 2026
750Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
750Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
750Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
750Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
750Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
750Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
750Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for GGS ?
?
What was GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on GGS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with GGS ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view GGS's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?