Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GreenYellow PortugalGreenYellow Portugal
VS
ENGIEENGIE
GreenYellow Portugal

GreenYellow Portugal

Oeiras, PT

Last Update: 22/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.greenyellow.pt/
752/1000Fair

GreenYellow, empresa francesa fundada em 2007, tornou-se um ator principal na transição energética da França e do exterior, sendo um verdadeiro colaborador de empresas e comunidades. Como especialista na produção fotovoltaica descentralizada, projetos de eficiência en...

NAICS:22113
NAICS Definition:Electric Power Generation
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ENGIE

ENGIE

1 place Samuel de Champlain, Paris, La défense, 92930, FR

Last Update: 13/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.engie.com/en
801/1000Good

What if your next career adventure started with ENGIE? Joining ENGIE means being part of a company at the forefront of the energy transition, committed to accelerating the shift to a carbon-neutral economy. With 98,000 employees across 30 countries, ENGIE's operatio...

NAICS:22113
NAICS Definition:Electric Power Generation
Employees:44,927
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GreenYellow Portugal

GreenYellow Portugal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ENGIE

ENGIE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GreenYellow Portugal in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ENGIE in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GreenYellow Portugal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GreenYellow Portugal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ENGIE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ENGIE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GreenYellow Portugal

GreenYellow Portugal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ENGIE

ENGIE

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ENG05311923

FAQ

Between GreenYellow Portugal company and ENGIE company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal company and ENGIE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal company and ENGIE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal company and ENGIE company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal company and ENGIE company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal company and ENGIE company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal company and ENGIE company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal company and ENGIE company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal company and ENGIE company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal company and ENGIE company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal company and ENGIE company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal and ENGIE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal and ENGIE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GreenYellow Portugal or ENGIE ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GreenYellow Portugal or ENGIE ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal and ENGIE, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GreenYellow Portugal and ENGIE, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2