Comparison Overview
Green Valley Consulting Engineers

Green Valley Consulting Engineers
335 Tesconi Circle, Santa Rosa, California, 95401, US
Last Update: 16/01/2026
We are a civil engineering, construction management, construction inspection and land surveying firm, passionate about enriching and enhancing the communities in which we live, work, and play. Located in Santa Rosa, California, we were founded more than two decades ago ...

Parsons Corporation
14291 Park Meadow Dr, Chantilly, Virginia, US, 20151
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Founded in 1944, Parsons Corporation, a digitally enabled solutions provider, is focused on creating the future of the defense, intelligence, and critical infrastructure markets. From Earth to outer space, we deliver tomorrow’s solutions today. Equipped with the capabil...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Green Valley Consulting Engineers







Parsons Corporation






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Green Valley Consulting Engineers in 2026.
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Parsons Corporation in 2026.
Incident History - Green Valley Consulting Engineers (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Green Valley Consulting Engineers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Parsons Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Parsons Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Green Valley Consulting Engineers

Parsons Corporation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.