Comparison Overview

Green Field Farms Co-op

VS

Red Bull

Green Field Farms Co-op

6464 Fredericksburg Rd, None, Wooster, Ohio, US, 44691
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 550 and 599

Green Field Farms firmly believes in continuing our old-world tradition of providing healthy, nourishing food, for you and your family. We are a farmer owned co-op that bridges the gap between our farms and your table with products that go Beyond Organic. We are your source for many varieties of Organic Produce, Milk, Fertilizer, Sauerkraut, and Maple Syrup.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Red Bull

Am Brunnen 1, None, Fuschl, None, AT, 5330
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Red Bull Gives Wiiings to People and Ideas. This has driven us – and all we do – since 1987. Today, Red Bull operates in over 170 countries, selling more than 12 billion cans annually and growing! Above all, our people remain the essential ingredient in bringing the Red Bull brand to life. Check out our open roles to become part of the world of Red Bull. Most jobs take energy, ours give it. Check out our open roles to become part of the world of Red Bull – jobs.redbull.com

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 26,250
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-field-farms-co-op.jpeg
Green Field Farms Co-op
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-bull.jpeg
Red Bull
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Green Field Farms Co-op
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Red Bull
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

Green Field Farms Co-op has 40.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Bull in 2025.

Incident History — Green Field Farms Co-op (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Green Field Farms Co-op cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Red Bull (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Bull cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-field-farms-co-op.jpeg
Green Field Farms Co-op
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Phishing emails, Unpatched VPN services, Insecure RDP configurations
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-bull.jpeg
Red Bull
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Red Bull company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Green Field Farms Co-op company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Green Field Farms Co-op company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Red Bull company has not reported any.

In the current year, Green Field Farms Co-op company has reported more cyber incidents than Red Bull company.

Green Field Farms Co-op company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Red Bull company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Red Bull company nor Green Field Farms Co-op company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Red Bull company nor Green Field Farms Co-op company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Green Field Farms Co-op company nor Red Bull company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Green Field Farms Co-op nor Red Bull holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Red Bull company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Green Field Farms Co-op company.

Red Bull company employs more people globally than Green Field Farms Co-op company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Green Field Farms Co-op nor Red Bull holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Green Field Farms Co-op nor Red Bull holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Green Field Farms Co-op nor Red Bull holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Green Field Farms Co-op nor Red Bull holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Green Field Farms Co-op nor Red Bull holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Green Field Farms Co-op nor Red Bull holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Framework prior to versions 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x display the full server stack trace when encountering an error within the GetCdfResource servlet.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Editor plugin versions before 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x, deserialize untrusted JSON data without constraining the parser to approved classes and methods.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The impacted element is an unknown function in the library /ctcms/libs/Ct_Config.php of the component Backend System Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument Cj_Add/Cj_Edit results in code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The affected element is the function Save of the file /ctcms/libs/Ct_App.php of the component Backend App Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument CT_App_Paytype leads to code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15, it was possible to accept an invitation opened by a different user. Version 5.15. contains a patch. As a workaround, avoid leaving one's Weblate sessions with an invitation opened unattended.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X