Comparison Overview

Great Clips Inc.

VS

Fosun 复星

Great Clips Inc.

4400 W. 78th St., Minneapolis, MN, 55435, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Established in Minneapolis in 1982, Great Clips has grown to be the world's largest and fastest growing salon brand. There are more than 4,400 salons throughout the United States and Canada -- all of them owned by franchisees. Visit us at www.greatclips.com Employment Information for Corporate Employees: - Competitive medical, dental, flexible spending and disability benefits - Flexible work options like compressed work weeks, and telecommuting - Award-winning wellness programs and tuition assistance - View corporate opportunities at: https://jobs.greatclips.com/corporate Stylists/Salon Managers can find employment information at: https://jobs.greatclips.com For more information on Great Clips franchises, visit www.GreatClipsFranchise.com

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 11,548
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fosun 复星

600, ZHONGSHAN NO.2 ROAD(E) SHANGHAI, 200010 PRC, Shanghai, 200010, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Fosun was founded in 1992. After more than 30 years of development, Fosun has become a global innovation-driven consumer group. Adhering to the mission of creating happier lives for families worldwide, Fosun is committed to creating a global happiness ecosystem fulfilling the needs for families in health, happiness, and wealth. In 2007, Fosun International Limited was listed on the main board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX stock code: 00656). As of 31 December 2024, Fosun International's total assets amounted to RMB796.5 billion and it received an AA MSCI ESG rating.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 17,203
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greatclips.jpeg
Great Clips Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fosun-group.jpeg
Fosun 复星
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Great Clips Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fosun 复星
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Clips Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fosun 复星 in 2025.

Incident History — Great Clips Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Clips Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fosun 复星 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fosun 复星 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greatclips.jpeg
Great Clips Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fosun-group.jpeg
Fosun 复星
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Great Clips Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fosun 复星 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fosun 复星 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Great Clips Inc. company.

In the current year, Fosun 复星 company and Great Clips Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fosun 复星 company nor Great Clips Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fosun 复星 company nor Great Clips Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fosun 复星 company nor Great Clips Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Great Clips Inc. company nor Fosun 复星 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Fosun 复星 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fosun 复星 company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Great Clips Inc. company.

Fosun 复星 company employs more people globally than Great Clips Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Fosun 复星 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Fosun 复星 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Fosun 复星 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Fosun 复星 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Fosun 复星 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Great Clips Inc. nor Fosun 复星 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H