Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Great Hearts AcademiesGreat Hearts Academies
VS
Clark County School DistrictClark County School District
Great Hearts Academies

Great Hearts Academies

701 N 44th St, None, Phoenix, Arizona, US, 85008

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
714/1000Moderate

Since its inception, Great Hearts has been on a mission to become a national leader in public charter schools. We work tirelessly to ensure our students receive an outstanding classical liberal arts education. Our program is anchored in exceptional teaching from the bes...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:1,226
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Clark County School District

Clark County School District

Clark County School District, Las Vegas, 89121, US

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
728/1000Moderate

The Clark County School District is the 5th largest school district in the nation with over 300,000 students in 357 schools and over 40,000 employees. Our focus is on people – the educators, staff, students and parents who make our community one of the most diverse an...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:23,267
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Great Hearts Academies

Great Hearts Academies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Clark County School District

Clark County School District

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Hearts Academies in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

Clark County School District has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Great Hearts Academies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Hearts Academies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Clark County School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clark County School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Great Hearts Academies

Great Hearts Academies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GRE500072625
Clark County School District

Clark County School District

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CLANEV1778215759
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CLA105072425

FAQ

Between Great Hearts Academies company and Clark County School District company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Great Hearts Academies company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Great Hearts Academies company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Great Hearts Academies company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Great Hearts Academies company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Great Hearts Academies company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Great Hearts Academies company and Clark County School District company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Great Hearts Academies company and Clark County School District company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Great Hearts Academies company and Clark County School District company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Great Hearts Academies company and Clark County School District company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Great Hearts Academies company and Clark County School District company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Great Hearts Academies and Clark County School District, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Great Hearts Academies and Clark County School District, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Great Hearts Academies or Clark County School District ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Great Hearts Academies or Clark County School District ?
Between Great Hearts Academies and Clark County School District, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Great Hearts Academies and Clark County School District, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA