Comparison Overview
Granite Wellness Centers

Granite Wellness Centers
406 Sunrise Ave, 100 & 105, Roseville, California, US, 95661
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Granite Wellness Centers (GWC) provides a full spectrum of programs focused toward reducing the social, health, and financial impact on our families and children from all types of substance use disorders. GWC has been saving and improving lives through substance use tre...

Home Instead
13323 California St, Omaha, NE, US, 68154
Last Update: 05/09/2026
As the world’s leading provider of in-home care, we help older adults live safely and independently at home, without sacrificing their quality of life. Whether they need occasional respite care or full-time support, our Care Pros are carefully selected to provide the be...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Granite Wellness Centers







Home Instead






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Individual and Family Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Granite Wellness Centers has 28.57% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Individual and Family Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Home Instead in 2026.
Incident History - Granite Wellness Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Granite Wellness Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Home Instead (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Home Instead cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Granite Wellness Centers

Home Instead
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.
The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.
An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.
A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.