Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Grand Millennium Tabuk HotelGrand Millennium Tabuk Hotel
VS
Radisson Hotel GroupRadisson Hotel Group
Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel

Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel

Gate 4 Tabuk University Complex Duba Road, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 47731, SA

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://qr1.be/RNZS
773/1000Fair

The Grand Millennium Tabuk is the first hotel to operate under the luxury portfolio of Millennium Hotels & Resorts MEA. Grand Millennium is gracefully situated in Tabuk. The hotel unfolds a story of the bygone era and is reminiscent of the vintage Hejaz Railway. Tabuk i...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:113
Subsidiaries:60
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Radisson Hotel Group

Radisson Hotel Group

44 Avenue du Bourget, Brussels, B-1130, BE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
815/1000Good

Radisson Hotel Group is an international hotel group, operating in EMEA and APAC with over 1,320 hotels in operation and under development in +95 countries. The international hotel group is rapidly expanding with a plan to significantly grow the portfolio. The Group’s o...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:17,162
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel

Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Radisson Hotel Group

Radisson Hotel Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Radisson Hotel Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Radisson Hotel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Radisson Hotel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel

Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Radisson Hotel Group

Radisson Hotel Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel and Radisson Hotel Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel and Radisson Hotel Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel or Radisson Hotel Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel or Radisson Hotel Group ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel and Radisson Hotel Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Grand Millennium Tabuk Hotel and Radisson Hotel Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2