Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Grand Millennium Al Seef BasraGrand Millennium Al Seef Basra
VS
DoubleTree by HiltonDoubleTree by Hilton
Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra

Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra

Iraq, Basra, IQ, 61001

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile

Enjoy the unique experience in the heart of Basra, Iraq, where safety and elegance meet in a 5-star Hotel. Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra, Basra, Iraq is the perfect venue to host your meetings, special events and happy moments with your family and friends. Our Hotel...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:93
Subsidiaries:60
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DoubleTree by Hilton

DoubleTree by Hilton

7930 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, US

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.doubletree.com
797/1000Fair

DoubleTree by Hilton hotels are distinctively designed properties that provide true comfort to today’s business and leisure travelers. From the millions of delighted hotel guests who are welcomed with the brand’s legendary, warm chocolate chip cookies at check-in to the...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:15,542
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra

Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DoubleTree by Hilton

DoubleTree by Hilton

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DoubleTree by Hilton in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DoubleTree by Hilton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DoubleTree by Hilton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra

Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DoubleTree by Hilton

DoubleTree by Hilton

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra and DoubleTree by Hilton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra and DoubleTree by Hilton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra or DoubleTree by Hilton ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra or DoubleTree by Hilton ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra and DoubleTree by Hilton, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Grand Millennium Al Seef Basra and DoubleTree by Hilton, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA