Comparison Overview
Grand Hyatt New York

Grand Hyatt New York
109 East 42nd St, New York, 10017, US
Last Update: 09/03/2026
Make your grand statement at Grand Hyatt New York, the only hotel connected to the majesty and advantages of Grand Central Terminal. 60,000 sq. ft. of recently upgraded meeting spaces can accommodate up to 1,700 attendees. Additionally, 1,298 stylishly modern guestroo...

Rotana Hotels
Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, AE, P.O. Box 95100
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Since inception, Rotana has grown to be the region’s largest hospitality management company, and a brand that is widely recognized and admired. Rotana currently manages a portfolio of over 100 properties throughout the Middle East, Africa, Eastern Europe and Türkiye o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Grand Hyatt New York







Rotana Hotels






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
Grand Hyatt New York has 34.21% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Rotana Hotels in 2026.
Incident History - Grand Hyatt New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Grand Hyatt New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Rotana Hotels (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rotana Hotels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Grand Hyatt New York

Rotana Hotels
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.