Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Grameenphone LtdGrameenphone Ltd
VS
Tata CommunicationsTata Communications
Grameenphone Ltd

Grameenphone Ltd

Bashundhara, Baridhara, Dhaka, undefined, 1229, BD

Last Update: 26/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.grameenphone.com
780/1000Fair

The right and contemporary use of technology is key to the progress of a nation. Keeping this in mind, Grameenphone always brings future-proof technology in order to facilitate your progress. The possibilities in this new world are immense and someone as bright as you s...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:6,726
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tata Communications

Tata Communications

Tata Communications Ltd, Mumbai, 400070, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

Tata Communications is a digital ecosystem enabler that powers today’s fast-growing digital economy. We enable the digital transformation of enterprises globally, including 300 of the Fortune 500. We carry around 30% of the world’s internet routes and connects businesse...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:16,856
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Grameenphone Ltd

Grameenphone Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Communications

Tata Communications

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grameenphone Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Communications in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Grameenphone Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grameenphone Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Grameenphone Ltd

Grameenphone Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tata Communications

Tata Communications

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Tata Communications company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Tata Communications company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Tata Communications company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Tata Communications company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Tata Communications company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Tata Communications company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd and Tata Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd and Tata Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Grameenphone Ltd or Tata Communications ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Grameenphone Ltd or Tata Communications ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd and Tata Communications, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd and Tata Communications, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3