Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Grameenphone LtdGrameenphone Ltd
VS
FreeFree
Grameenphone Ltd

Grameenphone Ltd

Bashundhara, Baridhara, Dhaka, BD, 1229

Last Update: 09/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.grameenphone.com
783/1000Fair

The right and contemporary use of technology is key to the progress of a nation. Keeping this in mind, Grameenphone always brings future-proof technology in order to facilitate your progress. The possibilities in this new world are immense and someone as bright as you s...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:7,234
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Free

Free

16, Rue de la Ville-l'Évêque, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75008

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://etre-free.fr/
773/1000Fair

Trublion historique des Télécoms, Free reste un opérateur pas comme les autres. Nous continuons de nous distinguer de nos concurrents par nos produits, par notre politique tarifaire ou encore par le ton employé avec nos abonnés. Cette différence a aussi construit la gr...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:12,938
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Grameenphone Ltd

Grameenphone Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Free

Free

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grameenphone Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Free in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Grameenphone Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grameenphone Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Free (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Free cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Grameenphone Ltd

Grameenphone Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Free

Free

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Free company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Free company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Free company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Free company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Free company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Free company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Free company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Free company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Free company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Free company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd company and Free company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd and Free, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd and Free, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Grameenphone Ltd or Free ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Grameenphone Ltd or Free ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd and Free, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Grameenphone Ltd and Free, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2