Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Gram GamesGram Games
VS
UbisoftUbisoft
Gram Games

Gram Games

The Aircraft Factory, London, W6 0LE, GB

Last Update: 29/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://gram.gs
754/1000Fair

Gram Games is a venture-backed global mobile entertainment studio and the developer of global hits 1010!, Merged!, Six!, Bounzy!, Merge Dragons!, Merge Town!, Merge Farm!, Paint Tower!, and Merge Gems! For more information, visit www.gram.gs

NAICS:51126
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:169
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ubisoft

Ubisoft

2, Avenue Pasteur, Saint-Mandé, Île-de-France, FR, 94160

Last Update: 07/06/2026

View Profile
492/1000Critical

Ubisoft is a global leader in gaming with teams across the world crafting original and memorable gaming experiences featuring brands such as Assassin’s Creed®, Brawlhalla®, For Honor®, Far Cry®, Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon®, Just Dance®, Rabbids®, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six®...

NAICS:51126
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:21,990
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gram Games

Gram Games

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ubisoft

Ubisoft

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gram Games in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ubisoft in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Gram Games (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gram Games cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ubisoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ubisoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gram Games

Gram Games

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ubisoft

Ubisoft

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UBI1766901285
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UBI4432044091525
🔒 Incident : Breach
UBI056251223

FAQ

Between Gram Games company and Ubisoft company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gram Games company and Ubisoft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gram Games company and Ubisoft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gram Games company and Ubisoft company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gram Games company and Ubisoft company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gram Games company and Ubisoft company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gram Games company and Ubisoft company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gram Games company and Ubisoft company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gram Games company and Ubisoft company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gram Games company and Ubisoft company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gram Games company and Ubisoft company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gram Games and Ubisoft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gram Games and Ubisoft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gram Games or Ubisoft ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gram Games or Ubisoft ?
Between Gram Games and Ubisoft, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gram Games and Ubisoft, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA