Comparison Overview
Grafton Recruitment

Grafton Recruitment
Piazza Quattro Novembre, 5, Milano, 20124, IT
Last Update: 01/03/2026
Grafton is one of the largest recruitment companies worldwide. Our 43 years experience on the market as a Global Search & Selection network position us as a leader in promoting and providing the right recruitment services including: Permanent Recruitment, Flexible Talen...

Michael Page
PageGroup, Addlestone, Weybridge, GB, KT15 2QW
Last Update: 06/09/2026
Welcome to the Michael Page global company profile. Michael Page has five decades of expertise in professional services recruitment. We were established in London in 1976, and over this period we've grown organically to become one of the best-known and most respected c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Grafton Recruitment







Michael Page






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Grafton Recruitment in 2026.
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Michael Page in 2026.
Incident History - Grafton Recruitment (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Grafton Recruitment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Michael Page (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Michael Page cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Grafton Recruitment

Michael Page
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.