Comparison Overview
Grafana Labs
Grafana Labs
29 Broadway, Penthouse, New York, NY, US, 10006
Last Update: 19/05/2026
Grafana Labs, the company behind the open observability cloud, is founded on the principles of open source, open standards, open ecosystems, and open culture. Grafana Cloud, our fully managed observability platform, is flexible and built for scale, enabling organization...
Microsoft
1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, 98052, US
Last Update: 08/10/2026
Every company has a mission. What's ours? To empower every person and every organization to achieve more. We believe technology can and should be a force for good and that meaningful innovation contributes to a brighter world in the future and today. Our culture doesn’t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Grafana Labs
Microsoft
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Grafana Labs has 90.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Microsoft has 2645.1% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Grafana Labs (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Grafana Labs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Microsoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Microsoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Grafana Labs
Microsoft
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.