Comparison Overview

Grafana Labs

VS

Epic

Grafana Labs

29 Broadway, Penthouse, New York, NY, US, 10006
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://grafana.com

Grafana Labs, the company behind the open observability cloud, is founded on the principles of open source, open standards, open ecosystems, and open culture. Grafana Cloud, our fully managed observability platform, is flexible and built for scale, enabling organizations to see, understand, and act on all their disparate data so they can move at the speed of their ambitions. Today, more than 25 million users and 7,000+ customers – including Anthropic, Bloomberg, NVIDIA, Microsoft, and Salesforce – trust Grafana Labs to ensure reliability of their applications and systems, resolve incidents quickly, and optimize their telemetry to reduce noise and cost. We are a 100% remote company with 1,400+ team members across 40+ countries, and we’re backed by leading investors including Lightspeed Venture Partners, Sequoia Capital, GIC, Coatue, J.P. Morgan, CapitalG, and Lead Edge Capital. Follow Grafana Labs on LinkedIn and Twitter or visit grafana.com.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1,772
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Epic

1979 Milky Way, Verona, WI, US, 53593
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.epic.com/

Join us in our mission to help the world get well, help the world stay well, and help future generations be healthier. We hire smart and motivated people from all academic majors to code, test, and implement healthcare software that hundreds of millions of patients and doctors rely on to improve care and ultimately save lives around the globe. No healthcare experience is necessary; we'll train you to be an expert in health IT and we'll provide you with personal development classes to grow as a professional. Our expectations for you are high, but in healthcare so are the stakes.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 16,959
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grafana-labs.jpeg
Grafana Labs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epic1979.jpeg
Epic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grafana Labs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Epic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grafana Labs in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epic in 2026.

Incident History — Grafana Labs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grafana Labs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Epic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grafana-labs.jpeg
Grafana Labs
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network, SCIM Provisioning Misconfiguration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Client-side open redirect
Motivation: Account takeover, execution of malicious plugins
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epic1979.jpeg
Epic
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2021
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Hacktivism
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Epic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grafana Labs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Grafana Labs company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Epic company.

In the current year, Epic company and Grafana Labs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Epic company nor Grafana Labs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Epic company nor Grafana Labs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Epic company nor Grafana Labs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Grafana Labs company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Epic company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Grafana Labs nor Epic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Grafana Labs company nor Epic company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Epic company employs more people globally than Grafana Labs company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Grafana Labs nor Epic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grafana Labs nor Epic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grafana Labs nor Epic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grafana Labs nor Epic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grafana Labs nor Epic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grafana Labs nor Epic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References