Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

For more than 50 years, GQ has been the premier men’s magazine, providing definitive coverage of style and culture. With its unique and powerful design, work from the finest photographers, and a stable of award-winning writers, GQ reaches millions of leading men each month. The only publication that speaks to all sides of the male equation, GQ is simply sharper and smarter.

GQ Magazine A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

GQ Magazine

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

gq-magazine

Employees number:

438

Number of followers:

97,283

NAICS:

511

Industry Type:

Book and Periodical Publishing

Homepage:

gq.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

GQ _1896377

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreGQ Magazine Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 600 and 649

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gq-magazine.jpeg
GQ Magazine Book and Periodical Publishing
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreGQ Magazine Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gq-magazine.jpeg
GQ Magazine Book and Periodical Publishing
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

GQ Magazine Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
GQ MagazineBreach85412/2025NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Cybersecurity Alert: Hacker Leaks Data of 2.3 Million Wired.com Users, Claims Larger Condé Nast Breach On December 20, 2025, a hacker operating under the alias "Lovely" leaked what they claim is the personal data of over 2.3 million *Wired.com* users on the newly launched hacking forum *Breach Stars*. The leaked dataset includes full names, email addresses, user IDs, display names, account creation timestamps, and in some cases, last session dates though no passwords or payment information were exposed. The data spans accounts created between 2011 and 2022, with some records showing recent activity, suggesting a breach of a live or archived user database. The hacker accused Condé Nast, *Wired*’s parent company, of neglecting security warnings, stating they had spent a month attempting to alert the company before resorting to the leak. In a provocative message, they threatened to release data from over 40 million additional accounts across Condé Nast’s portfolio in the coming weeks. The leaked breakdown includes records from brands such as *GQ* (994K), *Vogue* (1.9M), *The New Yorker* (6.8M), and *Bon Appétit* (2M), among others. An entry labeled "NIL" with 9.5 million accounts remains unidentified, while smaller segments suggest the breach may involve centralized account infrastructure. Prior to the leak, the hacker had contacted journalists, including *DataBreaches.net*, posing as a security researcher before shifting to threats of public exposure. The method of the breach remains undisclosed, though analysis by *Hackread.com* confirms the legitimacy of the leaked *Wired* data. Condé Nast has yet to issue a public statement confirming or denying the incident. Until an official response is provided, the claims and leaked data remain unverified.

GQ, Condé Nast, Vogue, Wired, Self, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Teen Vogue and Condé Nast Traveler: Hacker Leaks 2.3M Wired.com Records, Claims 40M-User Condé Nast Breach
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 12/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Cybersecurity Alert: Hacker Leaks Data of 2.3 Million Wired.com Users, Claims Larger Condé Nast Breach On December 20, 2025, a hacker operating under the alias "Lovely" leaked what they claim is the personal data of over 2.3 million *Wired.com* users on the newly launched hacking forum *Breach Stars*. The leaked dataset includes full names, email addresses, user IDs, display names, account creation timestamps, and in some cases, last session dates though no passwords or payment information were exposed. The data spans accounts created between 2011 and 2022, with some records showing recent activity, suggesting a breach of a live or archived user database. The hacker accused Condé Nast, *Wired*’s parent company, of neglecting security warnings, stating they had spent a month attempting to alert the company before resorting to the leak. In a provocative message, they threatened to release data from over 40 million additional accounts across Condé Nast’s portfolio in the coming weeks. The leaked breakdown includes records from brands such as *GQ* (994K), *Vogue* (1.9M), *The New Yorker* (6.8M), and *Bon Appétit* (2M), among others. An entry labeled "NIL" with 9.5 million accounts remains unidentified, while smaller segments suggest the breach may involve centralized account infrastructure. Prior to the leak, the hacker had contacted journalists, including *DataBreaches.net*, posing as a security researcher before shifting to threats of public exposure. The method of the breach remains undisclosed, though analysis by *Hackread.com* confirms the legitimacy of the leaked *Wired* data. Condé Nast has yet to issue a public statement confirming or denying the incident. Until an official response is provided, the claims and leaked data remain unverified.

Ailogo

GQ Magazine Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for GQ Magazine

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GQ Magazine in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GQ Magazine in 2026.

Incident Types GQ Magazine vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GQ Magazine in 2026.

Incident History — GQ Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GQ Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

GQ Magazine Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

For more than 50 years, GQ has been the premier men’s magazine, providing definitive coverage of style and culture. With its unique and powerful design, work from the finest photographers, and a stable of award-winning writers, GQ reaches millions of leading men each month. The only publication that speaks to all sides of the male equation, GQ is simply sharper and smarter.

Loading...
similarCompanies

GQ Magazine Similar Companies

Forbes

Forbes Media is a global media, branding and technology company, with a focus on news and information about business, investing, technology, entrepreneurship, leadership and affluent lifestyles. The company publishes Forbes, Forbes Asia, and Forbes Europe magazines as well as Forbes.com. The Forbes

newsone

GQ Magazine CyberSecurity News

December 23, 2025 08:00 AM
The best password managers for stress-free logins

Discover GQ's 2026 selection of the best password managers to safeguard your online data and enhance security. We test the top-rated...

November 17, 2025 08:00 AM
Pierce Brosnan breaks the meta

For decades, he's been Hollywood's purest personification of charm: Remington Steele. Thomas Crown. James Bond! Now, at 72, the Irishman is...

November 11, 2025 08:00 AM
Oscar Isaac ‘Looking Like a Greek God’ in GQ Magazine

He is looking mighty fine! The post Oscar Isaac 'Looking Like a Greek God' in GQ Magazine appeared first on Reality Tea.

October 13, 2025 07:00 AM
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander appears on GQ Magazine cover

After the season Shai Gilgeous-Alexander had, it shouldn't be surprising to see him become a mainstream name. The Oklahoma City Thunder have...

February 27, 2025 08:00 AM
Archipelo comes out of stealth with $12M funding to secure human and AI-driven code

When it comes to AI software, you can build something clever, but that's not always the same as building something that is secure.

November 17, 2024 08:00 AM
Top 10 Best Hackers in India

Below is a detailed exploration of ten of India's most influential hackers, widely recognized as among the nation's top cybersecurity experts.

October 11, 2024 07:00 AM
Top hackers in India

1. Sunny Nehra Sunny Nehra, the founder of cybersecurity firm Secure Your Hacks, stands out prominently as the top hacker in India,...

August 07, 2024 07:00 AM
Meet this school dropout, who became a tech entrepreneur at age 19 and is now a millionaire running a multi-crore company in India

Trishneet Arora is the founder and CEO of TAC Security, a cybersecurity and risk and vulnerability management company.

July 26, 2024 07:00 AM
ZeroTier raises $13.5M to help avert CrowdStrike-like network problems

A startup has raised $13.5 million to at least improve some level of security for the kinds of devices that have been affected.

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

GQ Magazine CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of GQ Magazine

The official website of GQ Magazine is http://www.gq.com.

GQ Magazine’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, GQ Magazine’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 642, reflecting their Poor security posture.

How many security badges does GQ Magazine’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, GQ Magazine currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has GQ Magazine been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, GQ Magazine has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does GQ Magazine have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, GQ Magazine is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does GQ Magazine have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, GQ Magazine does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does GQ Magazine comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, GQ Magazine is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does GQ Magazine have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, GQ Magazine does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does GQ Magazine comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, GQ Magazine is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does GQ Magazine have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,GQ Magazine is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of GQ Magazine

GQ Magazine operates primarily in the Book and Periodical Publishing industry.

Number of Employees at GQ Magazine

GQ Magazine employs approximately 438 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by GQ Magazine

GQ Magazine presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

GQ Magazine’s LinkedIn Followers

GQ Magazine’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 97,283 followers.

NAICS Classification of GQ Magazine

GQ Magazine is classified under the NAICS code 511, which corresponds to Publishing Industries (except Internet).

GQ Magazine’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, GQ Magazine does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

GQ Magazine’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, GQ Magazine maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/gq-magazine.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving GQ Magazine

As of January 23, 2026, Rankiteo reports that GQ Magazine has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

GQ Magazine has an estimated 5,011 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at GQ Magazine ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Wired.com User Data Leak by Hacker 'Lovely'

Description: A hacker using the alias 'Lovely' leaked personal data of over 2.3 million Wired.com users, accusing Condé Nast of ignoring security warnings. The data includes full names, email addresses, user IDs, display names, and account timestamps but no passwords or payment information. The hacker claims access to over 40 million accounts across Condé Nast properties.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-12-20

Type: Data Breach

Threat Actor: Lovely

Motivation: Retaliation for ignored security warnings, potential financial gain (data sold on dark web)

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Data Compromised: 2,366,576 Wired.com user records; over 40 million records across Condé Nast properties

Systems Affected: Wired.com user database or shared Condé Nast identity platform

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential damage to Condé Nast and Wired.com reputation

Legal Liabilities: Potential regulatory violations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA)

Identity Theft Risk: High (exposed PII like names and email addresses)

Payment Information Risk: None (no payment data exposed)

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Full Names, Email Addresses, User Ids, Display Names, Account Creation/Update Timestamps, Last Session Dates and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Entity Name: Wired.com

Entity Type: Online Magazine/Website

Industry: Media/Publishing

Location: United States

Size: Large (subsidiary of Condé Nast)

Customers Affected: 2,366,576

Entity Name: Condé Nast (Parent Company)

Entity Type: Media Conglomerate

Industry: Media/Publishing

Location: United States

Size: Enterprise

Customers Affected: Over 40 million (across multiple brands)

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Type of Data Compromised: Full names, Email addresses, User ids, Display names, Account creation/update timestamps, Last session dates

Number of Records Exposed: 2,366,576 (Wired.com); over 40 million (Condé Nast properties)

Sensitivity of Data: Moderate (PII exposed but no passwords or payment data)

Data Exfiltration: Yes (leaked on hacking forum)

Personally Identifiable Information: Full namesEmail addressesUser IDs

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Regulations Violated: Potential GDPR, Potential CCPA,

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Source: Hackread.com

Date Accessed: 2025-12-20

Source: DataBreaches.net

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Hackread.comDate Accessed: 2025-12-20, and Source: DataBreaches.net.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Investigation Status: Ongoing (unverified by Condé Nast)

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Reconnaissance Period: 1 month (claimed time to convince Condé Nast to fix vulnerabilities)

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Lovely.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-12-20.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were 2,366 and576 Wired.com user records; over 40 million records across Condé Nast properties.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were 2,366 and576 Wired.com user records; over 40 million records across Condé Nast properties.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 42.4M.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Hackread.com and DataBreaches.net.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (unverified by Condé Nast).

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was 1 month (claimed time to convince Condé Nast to fix vulnerabilities).

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=gq-magazine' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge