Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance GroupGPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group
VS
USI Insurance ServicesUSI Insurance Services
GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

88/15 Bochorishvili, Tbilisi, Tbilisi, 0161, GE

Last Update: 15/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mygpi.ge
754/1000Fair

GPI holding is not just an insurance company. We offer our employees rewarding careers in a financially stable, progressive and supportive work environment. GPI Holding is a place with more than 400 active and innovative people specializing in sales, customer service, i...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:466
Subsidiaries:40
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
USI Insurance Services

USI Insurance Services

100 Summit Lake Drive, Valhalla, 10595, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.usi.com
773/1000Fair

USI is one of the largest insurance brokerage and consulting firms in the world, delivering property and casualty, employee benefits, personal risk, program and retirement solutions to large risk management clients, middle market companies, smaller firms and individuals...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:10,691
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
USI Insurance Services

USI Insurance Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USI Insurance Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - USI Insurance Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USI Insurance Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
USI Insurance Services

USI Insurance Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and USI Insurance Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and USI Insurance Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and USI Insurance Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and USI Insurance Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and USI Insurance Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and USI Insurance Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and USI Insurance Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and USI Insurance Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and USI Insurance Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and USI Insurance Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and USI Insurance Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group and USI Insurance Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group and USI Insurance Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group or USI Insurance Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group or USI Insurance Services ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group and USI Insurance Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group and USI Insurance Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-73250
SUMMARY

Notepad++ is a free and open-source source code editor. Prior to 8.9.7, the Notepad++ Windows 11 x64 and ARM64 installer passes the attacker-influenced installation directory `$INSTDIR` from PowerEditor/installer/nppSetup.nsi into a PowerShell `-Command` string used by RegisterMSIX to invoke Add-AppxPackage, allowing PowerShell subexpression syntax such as `$()` in the installation path to execute commands in the installer's security context when the context menu component is selected. This issue is fixed in version 8.9.7.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-73249
SUMMARY

calibre is an e-book manager. Prior to 9.12.0, the calibre Content Server endpoint POST /book-update-annotations/{library_id}/{book_id}/{fmt} in src/calibre/srv/books.py omits needs_db_write=True, causing Router.dispatch() to skip ctx.check_for_write_access() before update_annotations() passes attacker-controlled JSON to db.merge_annotations_for_book(), which allows a readonly user or an anonymous user on an unauthenticated deployment to persist unauthorized book annotation changes. This issue is fixed in version 9.12.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-73248
SUMMARY

calibre is an e-book manager. Prior to 9.12.0, calibre processes attacker-controlled composite_template metadata from a malicious EPUB, OPF, PDF, or similar file through program: and a nested template() call whose formatter does not inherit allow_python_templates=False, allowing a nested python: template to reach compile_python_template and execute arbitrary Python code when the file is opened or imported. This issue is fixed in version 9.12.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-73247
SUMMARY

Kestra is an open-source, event-driven orchestration platform. Prior to 2.0.0, Kestra's core/src/main/java/io/kestra/core/runners/pebble/functions/HttpFunction.java passes the user-controlled http() uri argument to URI.create() and the server-side HTTP client without restricting private, loopback, or link-local destinations, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to import and execute a flow that accesses internal services or cloud metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-73246
SUMMARY

Kestra is an open-source, event-driven orchestration platform. Prior to 2.0.0-rc6, Kestra's worker/src/main/java/io/kestra/worker/endpoint/WorkerEndpoint.java serves GET /worker without authentication and serializes the complete live Task object, which can expose commands, environment variables, HTTP headers, connection details, plaintext credentials, and execution identifiers while the main API on port 8080 remains protected. This issue is fixed in 2.0.0-rc6.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9