Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance GroupGPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group
VS
Bajaj General InsuranceBajaj General Insurance
GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

88/15 Bochorishvili, Tbilisi, Tbilisi, 0161, GE

Last Update: 15/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mygpi.ge
754/1000Fair

GPI holding is not just an insurance company. We offer our employees rewarding careers in a financially stable, progressive and supportive work environment. GPI Holding is a place with more than 400 active and innovative people specializing in sales, customer service, i...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:466
Subsidiaries:40
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bajaj General Insurance

Bajaj General Insurance

Yerawada, Bajaj Insurance House, Pune, Maharastra, IN, 411006

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

Bajaj General Insurance Limited (formerly known as Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited) is one of India’s leading, most trusted and dynamic private general insurance companies. It is a subsidiary of Bajaj Finserv Limited, India’s leading and most diversified...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:17,321
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bajaj General Insurance

Bajaj General Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bajaj General Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bajaj General Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bajaj General Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bajaj General Insurance

Bajaj General Insurance

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group and Bajaj General Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group and Bajaj General Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group or Bajaj General Insurance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group or Bajaj General Insurance ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group and Bajaj General Insurance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GPI Holding - Vienna Insurance Group and Bajaj General Insurance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1