Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GoPay IndonesiaGoPay Indonesia
VS
Shriram Finance LimitedShriram Finance Limited
GoPay Indonesia

GoPay Indonesia

Jalan Sultan Iskandarsyah, Kebayoran Baru, ID

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://gopay.co.id/
758/1000Fair

GoPay is a digital wallet under GoTo Financial and the GoTo Group, offering a wide range of secure and responsible financial services to Indonesians across all levels of society. With a mission to drive financial inclusion, GoPay empowers every Indonesian to easily mana...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:344
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Shriram Finance Limited

Shriram Finance Limited

Wockhardt Towers, Level-3, West Wing, C-2, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai, IN, 400051

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
801/1000Good

Shriram Finance is the country’s biggest retail NBFC offering credit solutions for commercial vehicles, two-wheeler loans, car loans, home loans, gold loans, personal and small business loans. We are part of the 50-year-old Shriram Group, a financial conglomerate that h...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:34,477
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GoPay Indonesia

GoPay Indonesia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Shriram Finance Limited

Shriram Finance Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GoPay Indonesia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shriram Finance Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GoPay Indonesia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GoPay Indonesia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Shriram Finance Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shriram Finance Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GoPay Indonesia

GoPay Indonesia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Shriram Finance Limited

Shriram Finance Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GoPay Indonesia company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GoPay Indonesia company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GoPay Indonesia company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GoPay Indonesia company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GoPay Indonesia company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GoPay Indonesia company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GoPay Indonesia company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GoPay Indonesia company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GoPay Indonesia company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GoPay Indonesia company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GoPay Indonesia company and Shriram Finance Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GoPay Indonesia and Shriram Finance Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GoPay Indonesia and Shriram Finance Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GoPay Indonesia or Shriram Finance Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GoPay Indonesia or Shriram Finance Limited ?
Between GoPay Indonesia and Shriram Finance Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GoPay Indonesia and Shriram Finance Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3