Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GOPAY s.r.o.GOPAY s.r.o.
VS
AegonAegon
GOPAY s.r.o.

GOPAY s.r.o.

Pražská třída 1247/24 , České Budějovice, Česká republika, 370 04, CZ

Last Update: 03/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gopay.com
754/1000Fair

Přemýšlíme, vymýšlíme, inovujeme. Vytváříme úžasnou platební bránu, díky které je placení radost. Nikdy se nechceme stát obyčejnou firmou. Rozmanitost, invence, nápady, radost a nadšení jsou totiž klíčem k našemu úspěchu Staň se členem týmu GoPay v Českých Budějovicích ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:52
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aegon

Aegon

Schiphol Boulevard 223, Schiphol, 1118 BH, NL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.aegon.com
784/1000Fair

People are living longer, and we are excited about the possibilities this brings. We see longevity, aging, and changing life patterns as an opportunity for our customers, our employees, and society as a whole. And we want to support everyone in building the financial me...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:41,246
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GOPAY s.r.o.

GOPAY s.r.o.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aegon

Aegon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GOPAY s.r.o. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aegon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GOPAY s.r.o. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GOPAY s.r.o. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aegon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aegon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GOPAY s.r.o.

GOPAY s.r.o.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aegon

Aegon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GOPAY s.r.o. company and Aegon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. company and Aegon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. company and Aegon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. company and Aegon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. company and Aegon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. company and Aegon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. company and Aegon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. company and Aegon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. company and Aegon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. company and Aegon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. company and Aegon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. and Aegon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. and Aegon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GOPAY s.r.o. or Aegon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GOPAY s.r.o. or Aegon ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. and Aegon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GOPAY s.r.o. and Aegon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9